Comparison Overview

Please Touch Museum

VS

Cedar Rapids Museum of Art

Please Touch Museum

4231 Avenue of the Republic Ave, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19131, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Since 1976, Please Touch Museum has been the Children’s Museum of Philadelphia. Our museum was the first in the nation whose target audience was families with children seven and younger. We have grown into one of the best children’s museums in the nation, have become experts in play and have had our programs for under served families in the region nationally recognized. Please Touch Museum’s mission is to “Change a child’s life as they discover the power of learning through play.” Our Museum is where lifelong learning begins, curiosity is encouraged and every child is always welcome. Underpinning this mission is a promise, “To be a leader in 21st century children’s museums as a key resource of learning through play, and expand our reach and impact in the Philadelphia region and beyond.” To fulfill this promise, Please Touch Museum will continue to be inclusive, open and accessible to all communities

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 125
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cedar Rapids Museum of Art

410 3rd Ave SE, Cedar Rapids, IA, 52401, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The mission of the Cedar Rapids Museum of Art is to excite, engage, and educate through the arts. The Cedar Rapids Museum of Art houses more than 8,000 works of art spanning many eras—from Roman antiquity to the present. The collection is particularly strong in American art, especially from the first half of the 20th century. There are a number of artists the Museum holds in great depth—including the world's largest collection of works of art by Grant Wood. The Museum also possesses a strong collection of Roman portrait busts donated by Tom and Nan Riley, and an extensive print collection from the 15th century forward primarily donated by Peter O. Stamats. The collection is too comprehensive to be displayed all at once. That means chances are good that you'll see different, breathtaking pieces each time you visit!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/please-touch-museum.jpeg
Please Touch Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedar-rapids-museum-of-art.jpeg
Cedar Rapids Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Please Touch Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cedar Rapids Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Please Touch Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cedar Rapids Museum of Art in 2025.

Incident History — Please Touch Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Please Touch Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cedar Rapids Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cedar Rapids Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/please-touch-museum.jpeg
Please Touch Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedar-rapids-museum-of-art.jpeg
Cedar Rapids Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Please Touch Museum company and Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Please Touch Museum company.

In the current year, Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company and Please Touch Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company nor Please Touch Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company nor Please Touch Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company nor Please Touch Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Please Touch Museum company nor Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Please Touch Museum nor Cedar Rapids Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Please Touch Museum company nor Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Please Touch Museum company employs more people globally than Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Please Touch Museum nor Cedar Rapids Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Please Touch Museum nor Cedar Rapids Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Please Touch Museum nor Cedar Rapids Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Please Touch Museum nor Cedar Rapids Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Please Touch Museum nor Cedar Rapids Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Please Touch Museum nor Cedar Rapids Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X