Comparison Overview

Pleasant View, Inc.

VS

Cofertility

Pleasant View, Inc.

151 Commerce Dr, Harrisonburg, 22802, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Pleasant View, Incorporated is a nonprofit 501 (C)(3) agency in Rockingham County. For over 50 years, Pleasant View, Inc. has provided a variety of residential and day supportive services for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. At Pleasant View Inc, our mission is to support individuals who have disabilities in living out their own goals for meaningful work, relationships, and spiritual development. Our vision is that all people will have the opportunity to live in and enrich their communities. We strive to make a the world a better place for individuals with disabilities. We invite you to connect and to get to know our individuals at: www.pleasantviewinc.org, or on Facebook at www.facebook.com/pleasantviewinc Looking for a rewarding career or interested in helping us achieve our mission? Visit our career page at www.pleasantviewinc.org/careersopportunities

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 94
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cofertility

Los Angeles, 90005, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Cofertility is a human-first fertility ecosystem rewriting the egg freezing and egg donation experience. Our Freeze platform enables women to freeze their eggs for free when they donate half of the eggs to a family that otherwise can’t conceive. For intended parents pursuing egg donation, our Family platform serves as a more transparent, ethical egg donor matching platform. We are obsessed with improving the family-building journey — today or in the future — and are in an endless pursuit to make these experiences more positive.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pleasant-view-inc.jpeg
Pleasant View, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cofertility.jpeg
Cofertility
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pleasant View, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cofertility
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pleasant View, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cofertility in 2025.

Incident History — Pleasant View, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pleasant View, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cofertility (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cofertility cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pleasant-view-inc.jpeg
Pleasant View, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cofertility.jpeg
Cofertility
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pleasant View, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cofertility company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cofertility company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pleasant View, Inc. company.

In the current year, Cofertility company and Pleasant View, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cofertility company nor Pleasant View, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cofertility company nor Pleasant View, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cofertility company nor Pleasant View, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pleasant View, Inc. company nor Cofertility company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pleasant View, Inc. nor Cofertility holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pleasant View, Inc. company nor Cofertility company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pleasant View, Inc. company employs more people globally than Cofertility company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Pleasant View, Inc. nor Cofertility holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pleasant View, Inc. nor Cofertility holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pleasant View, Inc. nor Cofertility holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pleasant View, Inc. nor Cofertility holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pleasant View, Inc. nor Cofertility holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pleasant View, Inc. nor Cofertility holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H