Comparison Overview

PLAZZA AG

VS

Mooiland

PLAZZA AG

Sieberstrasse 5, Zürich, 8055, CH
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

PLAZZA plant, realisiert, bewirtschaftet und vermarktet Liegenschaften und Immobilienprojekte in der Schweiz. PLAZZA bewirtschaftet gezielt ihr Bestandesportfolio an Wohn- und Geschäftsliegenschaften mit Schwerpunkt im Wirtschaftsraum Zürich. Hinzu kommen Entwicklungsliegenschaften und -projekte in den Wirtschaftszentren Zürich und Lausanne, die schrittweise einer künftigen Nutzung zugeführt werden sollen. Die geografisch und segmentspezifisch klare Ausrichtung des Portfolios auf zentrumsnahe, gut erschlossene Liegenschaften trägt zur nachhaltigen Stabilität von PLAZZA bei und wird auch in Zukunft Erfolg versprechend sein. Die PLAZZA AG (Ticker: PLAN) ist seit Juni 2015 an der SIX Swiss Exchange kotiert und hat ihren Sitz in Zürich.

NAICS: 53
NAICS Definition: Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mooiland

Arnoud van Gelderweg 69 , Grave, 5361 CV, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

As a corporation, we house more than 50,000 people in 22,000 homes throughout the Netherlands. We give at home by providing sufficient affordable, good quality and sustainable rental housing. But we like to do more. We like to be a corporation that is recognisable, approachable and accessible to ouw residents.

NAICS: 53
NAICS Definition: Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Employees: 302
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/plazza-ag.jpeg
PLAZZA AG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mooiland.jpeg
Mooiland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PLAZZA AG
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mooiland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate and Equipment Rental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PLAZZA AG in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate and Equipment Rental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mooiland in 2025.

Incident History — PLAZZA AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PLAZZA AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mooiland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mooiland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/plazza-ag.jpeg
PLAZZA AG
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mooiland.jpeg
Mooiland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PLAZZA AG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mooiland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mooiland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PLAZZA AG company.

In the current year, Mooiland company and PLAZZA AG company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mooiland company nor PLAZZA AG company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mooiland company nor PLAZZA AG company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mooiland company nor PLAZZA AG company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PLAZZA AG company nor Mooiland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PLAZZA AG nor Mooiland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PLAZZA AG company nor Mooiland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mooiland company employs more people globally than PLAZZA AG company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate and Equipment Rental Services.

Neither PLAZZA AG nor Mooiland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PLAZZA AG nor Mooiland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PLAZZA AG nor Mooiland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PLAZZA AG nor Mooiland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PLAZZA AG nor Mooiland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PLAZZA AG nor Mooiland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H