Comparison Overview

PLANTA Restaurants

VS

Pizza Hut

PLANTA Restaurants

850 Commerce Street, Miami, Fl, 33139, CA
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)

Excellent

Created in 2016, PLANTA is a celebration of delicious and innovative plant-based cuisine served in beautifully designed spaces, without pretension and with an overflow of good vibes. Our mission is to make an impact by celebrating the power of plants, and to redefine hospitality while we do it. We're continually raising the bar and adjusting our goals to make our workplace, our communities, and the planet healthier and better for everyone. What youโ€™ll find with us is passion without pretense; a unique group that loves coming to work every day, shouts good morning, rolls up their sleeves and works together to redefine the future of hospitality. We're in the process of opening new beautiful spaces throughout the East Coast and West Coast, and we're looking for Hospitality Superstars. If you believe in the power of plants to change the world โ€” we want to hear from you. Apply now at [email protected]

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 199
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pizza Hut

7100 Corporate Dr, None, Plano, TX, US, 75024
Last Update: 2025-08-05 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Pizza Hut, a subsidiary of Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE: YUM), was founded in 1958 in Wichita, Kansas, and since then has earned a reputation as a trailblazer in innovation with the creation of icons like Originalยฎ Pan and Originalยฎ Stuffed Crust pizzas. In 1994, Pizza Hut pizza was the very first online food order. Today, Pizza Hut continues leading the way in the digital and technology space with over half of transactions worldwide coming from digital orders. A global leader in the pizza category, Pizza Hut operates more than 19,500 restaurants in 110 markets and territories. Through its enormous presence, Pizza Hut works to unlock opportunity for its team members and communities around the world.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 84,111
Subsidiaries: 27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/planta-restaurants.jpeg
PLANTA Restaurants
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pizza-hut.jpeg
Pizza Hut
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
PLANTA Restaurants
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pizza Hut
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PLANTA Restaurants in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pizza Hut in 2025.

Incident History โ€” PLANTA Restaurants (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PLANTA Restaurants cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Pizza Hut (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pizza Hut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/planta-restaurants.jpeg
PLANTA Restaurants
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pizza-hut.jpeg
Pizza Hut
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Website Intrusion
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both PLANTA Restaurants company and Pizza Hut company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Pizza Hut company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas PLANTA Restaurants company has not reported any.

In the current year, Pizza Hut company and PLANTA Restaurants company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Pizza Hut company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while PLANTA Restaurants company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Pizza Hut company has disclosed at least one data breach, while PLANTA Restaurants company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Pizza Hut company nor PLANTA Restaurants company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PLANTA Restaurants company nor Pizza Hut company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Pizza Hut company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PLANTA Restaurants company.

Pizza Hut company employs more people globally than PLANTA Restaurants company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X