Comparison Overview

PlanSmart NJ

VS

Transport Action Canada

PlanSmart NJ

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

PlanSmart NJ is an independent, non-profit planning and research organization committed to improving the quality of community life through the advancement of sound land use planning and regional cooperation. Drawing on over 40 years experience, PlanSmart NJ concentrates on land use, transportation, housing, environmental conservation, and related issues throughout the State of New Jersey. PlanSmart NJ believes that balanced and thoughtful land use planning can strengthen our economy and environment to make New Jersey a better place to live, work, and play for all. We help refocus the debate away from whether New Jersey should grow, to how best we can grow. We believe growth must balance both the environmental and economic needs of the state.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Transport Action Canada

Box/C.P. 858, Station B, Ottawa, ON, CA, K1P 5P9
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Transport Action Canada, founded as Transport 2000 Canada in 1976, is the nation’s leading citizen transportation advocacy group. We represent the interests of consumers or users of public transport services in Canada. Our advocacy work revolves around: - the development of rail passenger services in Canada; - the future of inter-city bus services and their connectivity to rail and air services; - urban and commuter transit systems; - the impact on the public interest of demands for new highway spending

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/plansmart-nj.jpeg
PlanSmart NJ
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transportaction.jpeg
Transport Action Canada
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PlanSmart NJ
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transport Action Canada
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PlanSmart NJ in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transport Action Canada in 2025.

Incident History — PlanSmart NJ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PlanSmart NJ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transport Action Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transport Action Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/plansmart-nj.jpeg
PlanSmart NJ
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transportaction.jpeg
Transport Action Canada
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PlanSmart NJ company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Transport Action Canada company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Transport Action Canada company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PlanSmart NJ company.

In the current year, Transport Action Canada company and PlanSmart NJ company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Transport Action Canada company nor PlanSmart NJ company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Transport Action Canada company nor PlanSmart NJ company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Transport Action Canada company nor PlanSmart NJ company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PlanSmart NJ company nor Transport Action Canada company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PlanSmart NJ nor Transport Action Canada holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PlanSmart NJ company nor Transport Action Canada company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Transport Action Canada company employs more people globally than PlanSmart NJ company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither PlanSmart NJ nor Transport Action Canada holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PlanSmart NJ nor Transport Action Canada holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PlanSmart NJ nor Transport Action Canada holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PlanSmart NJ nor Transport Action Canada holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PlanSmart NJ nor Transport Action Canada holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PlanSmart NJ nor Transport Action Canada holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H