Comparison Overview

Plan Sponsor Council of America

VS

American Legislative Exchange Council

Plan Sponsor Council of America

200 S. Wacker Dr., Chicago, Illinois, 60606, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.psca.org

The Plan Sponsor Council of America (PSCA) is a diverse, collaborative community of employee benefit plan sponsors, working together on behalf of millions of employees to solve real problems, create positive change, and expand on the success of America’s voluntary, employer-sponsored retirement system. With members representing employers of all sizes, PSCA offers a forum for comprehensive dialogue. By sharing our collective knowledge and experience as plan sponsors, PSCA also serves as a resource to policymakers, the media and other stakeholders as part of its commitment to improving retirement security for millions of Americans. For more information, visit www.psca.org.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

American Legislative Exchange Council

undefined, Arlington, VA, 22202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.alec.org

The American Legislative Exchange Council is America’s largest nonpartisan, voluntary membership organization of state legislators dedicated to the principles of limited government, free markets and federalism. Comprised of nearly one-quarter of the country’s state legislators and stakeholders from across the policy spectrum, ALEC members represent more than 60 million Americans and provide jobs to more than 30 million people in the United States.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 191
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-legislative-exchange-council.jpeg
American Legislative Exchange Council
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Plan Sponsor Council of America
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
American Legislative Exchange Council
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Plan Sponsor Council of America in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Legislative Exchange Council in 2025.

Incident History — Plan Sponsor Council of America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Plan Sponsor Council of America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — American Legislative Exchange Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Legislative Exchange Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/plan-sponsor-council-of-america.jpeg
Plan Sponsor Council of America
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-legislative-exchange-council.jpeg
American Legislative Exchange Council
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

American Legislative Exchange Council company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Plan Sponsor Council of America company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, American Legislative Exchange Council company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Plan Sponsor Council of America company.

In the current year, American Legislative Exchange Council company and Plan Sponsor Council of America company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither American Legislative Exchange Council company nor Plan Sponsor Council of America company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither American Legislative Exchange Council company nor Plan Sponsor Council of America company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither American Legislative Exchange Council company nor Plan Sponsor Council of America company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Plan Sponsor Council of America company nor American Legislative Exchange Council company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Plan Sponsor Council of America nor American Legislative Exchange Council holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Plan Sponsor Council of America company nor American Legislative Exchange Council company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

American Legislative Exchange Council company employs more people globally than Plan Sponsor Council of America company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Plan Sponsor Council of America nor American Legislative Exchange Council holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Plan Sponsor Council of America nor American Legislative Exchange Council holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Plan Sponsor Council of America nor American Legislative Exchange Council holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Plan Sponsor Council of America nor American Legislative Exchange Council holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Plan Sponsor Council of America nor American Legislative Exchange Council holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Plan Sponsor Council of America nor American Legislative Exchange Council holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References