Comparison Overview

Peters & Kappenman, P.A.

VS

Pamir Law Group

Peters & Kappenman, P.A.

7300 Metro Blvd., Ste. 500, Minneapolis, MN, US, 55439
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Peters & Kappenman, P.A. dedicates its practice exclusively to advising and representing employers in labor and employment matters. With a nationwide practice covering virtually every industry, our clients range in size from Fortune 500 companies, small and family-owned businesses to trade associations. Our lawyers have over 100 combined years of experience representing management in such key areas as: labor relations negotiations employment litigation workers'​ compensation human resource counseling and training Peters & Kappenman, P.A. provides employers with what they expect from law firms: honest advice, straight answers, accessibility, responsiveness, experience and aggressive representation.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pamir Law Group

7F, No. 214, Dun Hua North Road,, Taipei, Taipei, 10546, TW
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Pamir Law Group is an international law and business consulting firm based in Asia with offices in Taipei, Shanghai and Beijing. Pamir provides an integrated business/legal advisory approach focused on client growth, cost effectiveness, measurable results, effective communication and home turf advantage in Taiwan/China. The firm has a long track record of successfully closing transactions in a broad range of industries and assisting clients enforce their rights in judicial and arbitral proceedings. Pamir assists companies and investors in developing and implementing cross-border strategies to achieve safer business operations and growth in Greater China. We support chief executive officers, chief operating officers, general counsel and international law firms in managing, protecting and growing their businesses with practical and effective solutions in a wide range of corporate/commercial and litigation/arbitration matters in Taiwan and China, including: • Mergers and Acquisitions • Private Equity/Venture Capital • Direct Foreign Investment (Outbound and Inbound) • Corporate and Tax Structuring • Environmental Regulatory and Transactional Issues • CIETAC and Taiwan Arbitration • Complex Litigation (cross-border discovery and enforcement, white collar, anti-trust, intellectual property) • Intellectual Property Licensing and Anti-Counterfeiting • Labor and Human Resource Matters • Regulatory and Licensing Approvals • Telecommunications Regulatory Issues • Government Relations • Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and Corruption Matters The firm maintains an independent Co-Counsel “Renaissance” Network in 18 cities in China. Pamir is also a member of Terralex, the largest international network of independent law firms.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pklaborlaw.jpeg
Peters & Kappenman, P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pamir-law-group.jpeg
Pamir Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Peters & Kappenman, P.A.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pamir Law Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peters & Kappenman, P.A. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pamir Law Group in 2025.

Incident History — Peters & Kappenman, P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peters & Kappenman, P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pamir Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pamir Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pklaborlaw.jpeg
Peters & Kappenman, P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pamir-law-group.jpeg
Pamir Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Peters & Kappenman, P.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pamir Law Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pamir Law Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Peters & Kappenman, P.A. company.

In the current year, Pamir Law Group company and Peters & Kappenman, P.A. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pamir Law Group company nor Peters & Kappenman, P.A. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pamir Law Group company nor Peters & Kappenman, P.A. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pamir Law Group company nor Peters & Kappenman, P.A. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Peters & Kappenman, P.A. company nor Pamir Law Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Peters & Kappenman, P.A. nor Pamir Law Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Peters & Kappenman, P.A. company nor Pamir Law Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pamir Law Group company employs more people globally than Peters & Kappenman, P.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Peters & Kappenman, P.A. nor Pamir Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Peters & Kappenman, P.A. nor Pamir Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Peters & Kappenman, P.A. nor Pamir Law Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Peters & Kappenman, P.A. nor Pamir Law Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Peters & Kappenman, P.A. nor Pamir Law Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Peters & Kappenman, P.A. nor Pamir Law Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X