Comparison Overview

Pizza Hut

VS

Darden

Pizza Hut

7100 Corporate Dr, None, Plano, TX, US, 75024
Last Update: 2025-08-05 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Pizza Hut, a subsidiary of Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE: YUM), was founded in 1958 in Wichita, Kansas, and since then has earned a reputation as a trailblazer in innovation with the creation of icons like Originalยฎ Pan and Originalยฎ Stuffed Crust pizzas. In 1994, Pizza Hut pizza was the very first online food order. Today, Pizza Hut continues leading the way in the digital and technology space with over half of transactions worldwide coming from digital orders. A global leader in the pizza category, Pizza Hut operates more than 19,500 restaurants in 110 markets and territories. Through its enormous presence, Pizza Hut works to unlock opportunity for its team members and communities around the world.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 84,111
Subsidiaries: 27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Darden

1000 Darden Center Drive, Orlando, FL, 32837, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Darden is a restaurant company featuring a portfolio of differentiated brands that include Olive Garden, LongHorn Steakhouse, Yard House, Ruth's Chris Steak House, Cheddar's Scratch Kitchen, The Capital Grille, Seasons 52, Eddie V's, and Bahama Breeze. Our people equal our success, and we are proud to employ 190,000 team members in more than 2,000 restaurants. Together, we create memorable experiences for 380 million guests each year in communities across North America.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 71,807
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pizza-hut.jpeg
Pizza Hut
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/darden.jpeg
Darden
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Pizza Hut
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Darden
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pizza Hut in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Darden in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Pizza Hut (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pizza Hut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Darden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Darden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pizza-hut.jpeg
Pizza Hut
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Website Intrusion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/darden.jpeg
Darden
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Pizza Hut company and Darden company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Pizza Hut company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Darden company.

In the current year, Darden company and Pizza Hut company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Pizza Hut company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Darden company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Darden company and Pizza Hut company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Darden company nor Pizza Hut company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pizza Hut company nor Darden company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Pizza Hut company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Darden company.

Pizza Hut company employs more people globally than Darden company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X