Comparison Overview

Pizza Hut

VS

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

Pizza Hut

7100 Corporate Dr, None, Plano, TX, US, 75024
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://pizzahut.com

Pizza Hut, a subsidiary of Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE: YUM), was founded in 1958 in Wichita, Kansas, and since then has earned a reputation as a trailblazer in innovation with the creation of icons like Original® Pan and Original® Stuffed Crust pizzas. In 1994, Pizza Hut pizza was the very first online food order. Today, Pizza Hut continues leading the way in the digital and technology space with over half of transactions worldwide coming from digital orders. A global leader in the pizza category, Pizza Hut operates more than 19,500 restaurants in 110 markets and territories. Through its enormous presence, Pizza Hut works to unlock opportunity for its team members and communities around the world.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 84,111
Subsidiaries: 27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

5200 Buffington Road, None, Atlanta, GA, US, 30349
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://www.chick-fil-a.com/careers

At its Atlanta headquarters, known as the Corporate Support Center, Chick-fil-A, Inc. offers full-time careers in various fields such as Digital Transformation & Technology, Financial Services & Accounting, Enterprise Analytics, Restaurant Development, Early Talent Programs and more. Our team of more than 3,000 staff members tackles complex challenges every day — from restaurant design to food innovation, to infusing personalized service into digital spaces — all with the intent of supporting our owner-operators in delivering customer experiences defined by hospitality and care. Chick-fil-A, Inc. is the third largest quick-service restaurant company in the United States, known for its freshly-prepared food, signature hospitality and unique franchise model. More than 200,000 Team Members are employed by independent owner-operators in more than 3,000 restaurants across the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. In 2023, the company shared plans to expand by 2030 into Europe and Asia. Chick-fil-A owner-operators live and work in the communities their restaurants serve, each supporting local efforts to address hunger, education, and making a positive impact. The family-owned and privately held company was founded in 1967 by S. Truett Cathy.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 79,628
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pizza-hut.jpeg
Pizza Hut
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chick-fil-a-corporate.jpeg
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pizza Hut
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pizza Hut in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center in 2025.

Incident History — Pizza Hut (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pizza Hut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pizza-hut.jpeg
Pizza Hut
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chick-fil-a-corporate.jpeg
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Pizza Hut company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Pizza Hut company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company.

In the current year, Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company and Pizza Hut company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Pizza Hut company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company and Pizza Hut company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company nor Pizza Hut company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pizza Hut company nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pizza Hut nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Pizza Hut company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company.

Pizza Hut company employs more people globally than Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Neither Pizza Hut nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pizza Hut nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pizza Hut nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pizza Hut nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pizza Hut nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pizza Hut nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References