Comparison Overview

Pizza Hut

VS

Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc.

Pizza Hut

7100 Corporate Dr, None, Plano, TX, US, 75024
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849

Pizza Hut, a subsidiary of Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE: YUM), was founded in 1958 in Wichita, Kansas, and since then has earned a reputation as a trailblazer in innovation with the creation of icons like Original® Pan and Original® Stuffed Crust pizzas. In 1994, Pizza Hut pizza was the very first online food order. Today, Pizza Hut continues leading the way in the digital and technology space with over half of transactions worldwide coming from digital orders. A global leader in the pizza category, Pizza Hut operates more than 19,500 restaurants in 110 markets and territories. Through its enormous presence, Pizza Hut works to unlock opportunity for its team members and communities around the world.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 84,111
Subsidiaries: 27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc.

2202 N West Shore Blvd, None, Tampa, Florida, US, 33607
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Since the first Outback Steakhouse opened, our family of brands has expanded to include Carrabba's Italian Grill, Bonefish Grill, and Fleming's Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar. Together, these unique, Founder-inspired restaurants make up Bloomin' Brands, Inc. Today, we are one of the world's largest casual dining companies with approximately 81,000 Team Members and more than 1,450 restaurants worldwide. Bloomin’ Brands, Inc. is a company of restaurants, not a restaurant company. Our brands were founded by people who have a genuine passion for food and a desire to share hospitality with others. Our focus on quality extends beyond the food and service we provide to our guests – Our People are what set us apart and they are at the center of everything we do!

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 1,431
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pizza-hut.jpeg
Pizza Hut
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bloomin'​-brands-inc.jpeg
Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pizza Hut
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pizza Hut in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Pizza Hut (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pizza Hut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pizza-hut.jpeg
Pizza Hut
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bloomin'​-brands-inc.jpeg
Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pizza Hut company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Pizza Hut company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company and Pizza Hut company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Pizza Hut company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Pizza Hut company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company nor Pizza Hut company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pizza Hut company nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pizza Hut nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Pizza Hut company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company.

Pizza Hut company employs more people globally than Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Neither Pizza Hut nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pizza Hut nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pizza Hut nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pizza Hut nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pizza Hut nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pizza Hut nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N