Comparison Overview

Pixelwerx

VS

Toomey Graphics, LLC

Pixelwerx

121 Cheshire Lane #700, Minnetonka, 55305, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pixelwerx.net

Pixelwerx - a large format printing and graphics design company, offers high quality print and design solutions. We support marketing efforts of companies both large and small. We specialize in taking projects from concept through design, production and installation. Vehicle graphics, tradeshow solutions, out of home advertising projects are some of the areas that we work most in.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Toomey Graphics, LLC

6819 Redwood Drive, Cotati, 94931, US
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 750 and 799
http://toomeygraphics.com

Toomey Graphics (formerly Toomey Customs) is a multifaceted creative solutions company located in the North Bay of the San Francisco Bay Area. We are located in Cotati, but serve the surrounding areas of Santa Rosa, Petaluma, Rohnert Park, Sebastopol and beyond. We have been providing design and printing solutions to businesses and consumers since 2006. With over 20 years of industry experience, our specialties include print production, vinyl graphics, wall decals, screen printing, large format printing, canvas wraps, giclee fine art printing, digital photography, foamcore and gatorboard mounting.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pixelwerx.jpeg
Pixelwerx
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toomey-graphics-llc.jpeg
Toomey Graphics, LLC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pixelwerx
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Toomey Graphics, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pixelwerx in 2026.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Toomey Graphics, LLC in 2026.

Incident History — Pixelwerx (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pixelwerx cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Toomey Graphics, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toomey Graphics, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pixelwerx.jpeg
Pixelwerx
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toomey-graphics-llc.jpeg
Toomey Graphics, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Pixelwerx company and Toomey Graphics, LLC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Toomey Graphics, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pixelwerx company.

In the current year, Toomey Graphics, LLC company and Pixelwerx company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Toomey Graphics, LLC company nor Pixelwerx company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Toomey Graphics, LLC company nor Pixelwerx company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Toomey Graphics, LLC company nor Pixelwerx company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pixelwerx company nor Toomey Graphics, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pixelwerx nor Toomey Graphics, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pixelwerx company nor Toomey Graphics, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pixelwerx company employs more people globally than Toomey Graphics, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Pixelwerx nor Toomey Graphics, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pixelwerx nor Toomey Graphics, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pixelwerx nor Toomey Graphics, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pixelwerx nor Toomey Graphics, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pixelwerx nor Toomey Graphics, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pixelwerx nor Toomey Graphics, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References