Comparison Overview

PixelJacked

VS

Gray Malin

PixelJacked

undefined, undefined, West Sussex, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Everyone’s tastes are unique, and I keep that in mind and strive to make it into reality when I'm capturing their ideas within a photoshoot.   As a dedicated photographer, I make a strict point into learning and accommodating your vision and focusing on the specific needs in order to achieve the look that you had in mind.    I understand that every photo holds a message within it and it's my job to deliver that message in the best way possible that describes your product in a unique, memorable and fashionable manner. I believe that working hand in hand with my clients regarding the finest of details is what delivers a great image and ultimately allows us to achieve our goals together to best ensure that you are more then satisfied with the finished product.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gray Malin

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

The Gray Malin brand believes that a journey is more than just a photograph, it is a shared experience inspiring the idea that everyday can be a getaway. A company who has a deep passion for photography and interior design combined with the affection for travel and adventure inspired the character of the Gray Malin brand founded in 2009. The photographer and founder of Gray Malin Enterprises enforces his artistic ideals as the company’s Creative Director. Gray’s unparalleled expertise and vision has been the driving force behind his many works of art and remains the backbone of the brand. A brand that promises to ensure everyday can be a getaway, an adventure, and a journey with Gray Malin.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pixeljacked.jpeg
PixelJacked
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gray-malin.jpeg
Gray Malin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PixelJacked
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gray Malin
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PixelJacked in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gray Malin in 2025.

Incident History — PixelJacked (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PixelJacked cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gray Malin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gray Malin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pixeljacked.jpeg
PixelJacked
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gray-malin.jpeg
Gray Malin
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PixelJacked company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gray Malin company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gray Malin company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PixelJacked company.

In the current year, Gray Malin company and PixelJacked company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gray Malin company nor PixelJacked company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gray Malin company nor PixelJacked company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gray Malin company nor PixelJacked company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PixelJacked company nor Gray Malin company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PixelJacked nor Gray Malin holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PixelJacked company nor Gray Malin company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gray Malin company employs more people globally than PixelJacked company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither PixelJacked nor Gray Malin holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PixelJacked nor Gray Malin holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PixelJacked nor Gray Malin holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PixelJacked nor Gray Malin holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PixelJacked nor Gray Malin holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PixelJacked nor Gray Malin holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N