Comparison Overview

Pittsburgh Regional Transit

VS

Schneider

Pittsburgh Regional Transit

345 6th Ave, Third Floor, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US, 15222
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 0 and 549

Pittsburgh Regional Transit, formerly Port Authority of Allegheny County, is the nation’s 26th largest transit agency. Our 2,600 employees operate, maintain, and support bus, rail, and incline service in the Pittsburgh metro area.

NAICS: 484
NAICS Definition: Truck Transportation
Employees: 875
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Schneider

3101 S. Packerland Drive, Green Bay, WI, 54306-2545, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Put us on the job and consider it done. Schneider is a premier provider of transportation and logistics services headquartered in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and with offices in Chicago, Dallas and many cities in between. Offering one of the broadest portfolios in the industry, Schneider’s solutions include Regional and Long-Haul Truckload, Expedited, Dedicated, Bulk, Intermodal, Brokerage, Warehousing, Supply Chain Management and Port Logistics. With over $5 billion annual revenue, Schneider has been delivering superior customer experiences and safely getting it done for over 80 years. As proof of our commitment, we have collected a series of awards including the FreightTech 100 award, Inbound Logistics’ Green Supply Chain Partner Award, Women in Trucking’s Top Company for Women to Work in Transportation Award, and multiple top carrier of the year awards by customers like P&G. Contact Schneider at [email protected], follow us on Twitter at @WeAreSchneider or on YouTube, or dive into our rich content library at https://schneider.com/resources/best-practices. For more information, visit us at www.Schneider.com Interested in a career that makes a difference? Head to SchneiderJobs.com today to see what opportunities await. We look forward to have you on the team!

NAICS: 484
NAICS Definition: Truck Transportation
Employees: 10,972
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pittsburgh-regional-transit.jpeg
Pittsburgh Regional Transit
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schneider-national.jpeg
Schneider
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pittsburgh Regional Transit
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Schneider
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pittsburgh Regional Transit in 2025.

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schneider in 2025.

Incident History — Pittsburgh Regional Transit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pittsburgh Regional Transit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Schneider (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schneider cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pittsburgh-regional-transit.jpeg
Pittsburgh Regional Transit
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schneider-national.jpeg
Schneider
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Schneider company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pittsburgh Regional Transit company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Pittsburgh Regional Transit company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Schneider company has not reported any.

In the current year, Schneider company and Pittsburgh Regional Transit company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Pittsburgh Regional Transit company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Schneider company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Schneider company nor Pittsburgh Regional Transit company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Schneider company nor Pittsburgh Regional Transit company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pittsburgh Regional Transit company nor Schneider company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pittsburgh Regional Transit nor Schneider holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pittsburgh Regional Transit company nor Schneider company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Schneider company employs more people globally than Pittsburgh Regional Transit company, reflecting its scale as a Truck Transportation.

Neither Pittsburgh Regional Transit nor Schneider holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pittsburgh Regional Transit nor Schneider holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pittsburgh Regional Transit nor Schneider holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pittsburgh Regional Transit nor Schneider holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pittsburgh Regional Transit nor Schneider holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pittsburgh Regional Transit nor Schneider holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X