Comparison Overview

Pittsburgh Food Policy Council

VS

Public Policy Projects

Pittsburgh Food Policy Council

1435 Bedford Ave, Pittsburgh, 15219, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Pittsburgh Food Policy Council (PFPC)serves as a collaborative advisory organization , bringing together stakeholders from diverse food-related sectors to examine, develop, and improve the food system of our region. The PFPC convenes food systems stakeholders and change makers to network, break down silos, invite participation in decision making and priority setting, inspire collaboration, provide leadership development and training, develop comprehensive food policy approaches, and strengthen movement building. Combining dynamic presentations, collaborative activities and networking, PFPC hosts regular meetings to connect the larger community of advocates, entrepreneurs, community members and policymakers to help coordinate the activities and policy initiatives of the Working Groups.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Public Policy Projects

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Public Policy Projects is an organisation operating at the heart of health and life sciences policy delivery. We bring together senior leaders and practitioners in the public and private health and life sciences sectors to find realistic solutions to the most pressing issues relating to health and care delivery. We facilitate effective collaboration between public and private sector organisations. We help businesses to grow their profile within the NHS and wider public sector. In turn, we support public sector leaders and organisations with practical recommendations on implementing policy to improve health and wellbeing outcomes for local populations. We offer insight, analysis and intelligence through research, editorial, online and live events, and written reports.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pittsburgh-food-policy-council.jpeg
Pittsburgh Food Policy Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-policy-projects.jpeg
Public Policy Projects
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pittsburgh Food Policy Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Public Policy Projects
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pittsburgh Food Policy Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public Policy Projects in 2025.

Incident History — Pittsburgh Food Policy Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pittsburgh Food Policy Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Public Policy Projects (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Public Policy Projects cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pittsburgh-food-policy-council.jpeg
Pittsburgh Food Policy Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-policy-projects.jpeg
Public Policy Projects
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Public Policy Projects company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Public Policy Projects company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company.

In the current year, Public Policy Projects company and Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Public Policy Projects company nor Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Public Policy Projects company nor Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Public Policy Projects company nor Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company nor Public Policy Projects company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pittsburgh Food Policy Council nor Public Policy Projects holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company nor Public Policy Projects company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Public Policy Projects company employs more people globally than Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Pittsburgh Food Policy Council nor Public Policy Projects holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pittsburgh Food Policy Council nor Public Policy Projects holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pittsburgh Food Policy Council nor Public Policy Projects holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pittsburgh Food Policy Council nor Public Policy Projects holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pittsburgh Food Policy Council nor Public Policy Projects holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pittsburgh Food Policy Council nor Public Policy Projects holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H