Comparison Overview

Pittsburgh CLO

VS

Houston Symphony

Pittsburgh CLO

719 Liberty Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, US, 15222
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Since 1946, Pittsburgh CLO has been the driving force behind live musical theater in Pittsburgh and the entire Southwestern Pennsylvania region. Under the direction of Van Kaplan since 1997, this not-for-profit arts organization appreciates the support of nearly 200,000 patrons yearly who attend its performances at three venues in the Cultural District: a seasonal subscription series at the Benedum Center, A Musical Christmas Carol at the Byham Theater and year-round shows at the CLO Cabaret. Its dedication to the musical theater art form includes educational programs such as the CLO Academy for Performance and Art, the CLO Mini Stars, the Gene Kelly Awards, the Richard Rodgers Award and The National High School Theatre Awards. As part of its new works development, the organization has been involved with 22 Broadway shows (30 Tony Awards®), and in 2014 produced the world premiere of An American in Paris, on Broadway (4 Tony Awards®) and in London’s West End. For more information please visit pittsburghCLO.org

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 90
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Houston Symphony

615 Louisiana Street, Houston, TX, 77002, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

The Houston Symphony is at the forefront of a new era of growth and transformation. With an ambitious vision for the future, we are committed to being a world-class orchestra and a cultural leader in Houston, creating extraordinary musical experiences for all. Our outstanding orchestra, dedicated staff and Board, and dynamic Music Director Juraj Valčuha provide the foundation for our success. Together, we will create a new era of musical excellence and community engagement that will inspire and enrich the lives of all who experience the Houston Symphony.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 213
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pittsburgh-clo.jpeg
Pittsburgh CLO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/houston-symphony.jpeg
Houston Symphony
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pittsburgh CLO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Houston Symphony
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pittsburgh CLO in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Houston Symphony in 2025.

Incident History — Pittsburgh CLO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pittsburgh CLO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Houston Symphony (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Houston Symphony cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pittsburgh-clo.jpeg
Pittsburgh CLO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/houston-symphony.jpeg
Houston Symphony
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Houston Symphony company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pittsburgh CLO company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Houston Symphony company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pittsburgh CLO company.

In the current year, Houston Symphony company and Pittsburgh CLO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Houston Symphony company nor Pittsburgh CLO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Houston Symphony company nor Pittsburgh CLO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Houston Symphony company nor Pittsburgh CLO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pittsburgh CLO company nor Houston Symphony company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pittsburgh CLO nor Houston Symphony holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pittsburgh CLO company nor Houston Symphony company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Houston Symphony company employs more people globally than Pittsburgh CLO company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Pittsburgh CLO nor Houston Symphony holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pittsburgh CLO nor Houston Symphony holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pittsburgh CLO nor Houston Symphony holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pittsburgh CLO nor Houston Symphony holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pittsburgh CLO nor Houston Symphony holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pittsburgh CLO nor Houston Symphony holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N