Comparison Overview

Pisgah Legal Services

VS

Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy

Pisgah Legal Services

62 Charlotte Street, Asheville, 28801, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our Mission: To pursue justice by providing legal assistance and advocacy to help low-income people in Western North Carolina meet their basic needs and improve their lives. What We Do: Pisgah Legal Services is an innovative nonprofit founded in 1978 that: provides free civil legal aid to people who live in poverty; helps more than 23,000 of the most vulnerable people in our communities annually to meet urgent needs such as: housing, safety from abuse, health care and income; partners with dozens of other agencies to make sustainable change for people in crisis; coordinates the services of more than 250 pro bono attorneys in WNC; improves systems and policies that impact the lives of thousands of low-income people. Pisgah Legal Services provides a broad array of free civil legal aid, anti-poverty advocacy and access to health care in 18 counties and the Qualla Boundary in WNC. Program offerings vary by county depending on the availability and scope of funding. Pisgah Legal has offices in Asheville, Brevard, Burnsville, Cashiers, Franklin, Highlands, Hendersonville, Marshall, Morganton, Newland, Rutherfordton, Spruce Pine and Waynesville.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 127
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy

undefined, Camden , New Jersey, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Rutgers Journal of Law & Public Policy has become a premier forum for articulating the vital intersections between the law and public policy. Grounded in the ever-deepening awareness that interdisciplinary investigation is crucial to an understanding of both the law and our culture, the Journal provides a unique intellectual arena for encounters between law and a variety of disciplines. Submissions may be submitted through our Scholastica page or emailed to [email protected]

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rutgers-journal-of-law-and-public-policy.jpeg
Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pisgah Legal Services
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pisgah Legal Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy in 2025.

Incident History — Pisgah Legal Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pisgah Legal Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pisgah-legal-services.jpeg
Pisgah Legal Services
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rutgers-journal-of-law-and-public-policy.jpeg
Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pisgah Legal Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pisgah Legal Services company.

In the current year, Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy company and Pisgah Legal Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy company nor Pisgah Legal Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy company nor Pisgah Legal Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy company nor Pisgah Legal Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pisgah Legal Services company nor Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pisgah Legal Services nor Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pisgah Legal Services company nor Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pisgah Legal Services company employs more people globally than Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Pisgah Legal Services nor Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pisgah Legal Services nor Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pisgah Legal Services nor Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pisgah Legal Services nor Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pisgah Legal Services nor Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pisgah Legal Services nor Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X