Comparison Overview

Piscataway Public Library

VS

New Rochelle Public Library

Piscataway Public Library

500 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Piscataway Public Library is a statewide leader in public library service, and was recently voted one of the 2016 “Best of the Best” libraries in Middlesex County. With a documented history of providing pioneering programs and services, Piscataway Public Library is an organization that nurtures leadership and innovation. Piscataway Township is located in Middlesex County, across the river from the Rutgers University New Brunswick campus, and near the center of Einstein’s Alley - central New Jersey’s research and technology corridor. Boasting a richly diverse population of over 58,000, Piscataway is the home of several large corporate residents, including Johnson & Johnson, Colgate-Palmolive, and IEEE. Piscataway was recently ranked among the top ten most diverse towns in New Jersey, with significant non-white populations including African-American (20%), Asian (36%), and Hispanic (12%).

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

New Rochelle Public Library

1 Library Plaza, New Rochelle, NY, 10801, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Situated in downtown New Rochelle, the New Rochelle Public Library (NRPL) offers a comprehensive collection that includes retrospective and current materials; up-to-date technology by which information can be accessed; and a wide range of community services and programs tailored to a diverse audience. Chartered in 1894, NRPL is a school-district library with its own operating budget and a Board of Trustees comprised of seven elected members. It has served the 81,500 residents of New Rochelle from its main library building in the downtown business district since 1979. A smaller branch, located in the park in front of the New Rochelle High School, was restored through a grassroots effort and reopened as the Huguenot Children’s Library in 1997.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/piscataway-public-library.jpeg
Piscataway Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-rochelle-public-library.jpeg
New Rochelle Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Piscataway Public Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New Rochelle Public Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Piscataway Public Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Rochelle Public Library in 2025.

Incident History — Piscataway Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Piscataway Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New Rochelle Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Rochelle Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/piscataway-public-library.jpeg
Piscataway Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-rochelle-public-library.jpeg
New Rochelle Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Piscataway Public Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to New Rochelle Public Library company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, New Rochelle Public Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Piscataway Public Library company.

In the current year, New Rochelle Public Library company and Piscataway Public Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither New Rochelle Public Library company nor Piscataway Public Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither New Rochelle Public Library company nor Piscataway Public Library company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither New Rochelle Public Library company nor Piscataway Public Library company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Piscataway Public Library company nor New Rochelle Public Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Piscataway Public Library nor New Rochelle Public Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Piscataway Public Library company nor New Rochelle Public Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

New Rochelle Public Library company employs more people globally than Piscataway Public Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Piscataway Public Library nor New Rochelle Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Piscataway Public Library nor New Rochelle Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Piscataway Public Library nor New Rochelle Public Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Piscataway Public Library nor New Rochelle Public Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Piscataway Public Library nor New Rochelle Public Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Piscataway Public Library nor New Rochelle Public Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.