Comparison Overview

PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa

VS

Bollin Label

PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa

3616 West Cypress Street, Tampa, Florida 33607, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Pip Printing and Marketing Services has been serving the greater Tampa Bay area since 1986. This facility is family owned and operated and is a certified minority/woman owned business. Over the past 23 years our center has evolved from a printing and copying facility to a full service commercial print house offering print based marketing solutions. What makes us unique? PIP Printing is not your traditional printer. We help address all of your document, business, and marketing objectives with print based marketing solutions that meet your ever changing business needs. We can take your ideas from creation to print and provide you with visually appealing results that allow you to make a big impression. We understand the changing business marketplace and have the resources to address your marketing objectives with a wide variety of services. From traditional offset printing to multimedia marketing tools, PIP can do it all! We are in business to help you grow your business!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bollin Label

6001 Brent Drive, Toledo, Ohio, 43611, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Bollin Label prints and designs high-impact custom and stock labels along with merchandising solutions for a variety of products and markets. Our manufacturing process begins with a creative team of in-house artists whose designs are converted to digital plates for high-speed, sophisticated flexographic printing — all of which serve to produce top-quality labels for any product in any environment.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pip-printing-and-marketing-services-tampa.jpeg
PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bollin-label-systems.jpeg
Bollin Label
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bollin Label
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bollin Label in 2025.

Incident History — PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bollin Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bollin Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pip-printing-and-marketing-services-tampa.jpeg
PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bollin-label-systems.jpeg
Bollin Label
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company and Bollin Label company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Bollin Label company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company.

In the current year, Bollin Label company and PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bollin Label company nor PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bollin Label company nor PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bollin Label company nor PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company nor Bollin Label company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa nor Bollin Label holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company nor Bollin Label company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bollin Label company employs more people globally than PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa nor Bollin Label holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa nor Bollin Label holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa nor Bollin Label holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa nor Bollin Label holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa nor Bollin Label holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa nor Bollin Label holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N