Comparison Overview

Pioneer Sales Group, Inc.

VS

Rexel

Pioneer Sales Group, Inc.

6066 Shingle Creek Parkway, Minneapolis, MN, 55430, US
Last Update: 2025-03-13 (UTC)

Excellent

Since 1994, Pioneer Sales Group, Inc. has proudly represented manufactures in the Electrical, Industrial, and Lighting industries. Our dedication, versatility and expertise allows us to actively respond to the needs of our manufacturers partners and our customers; the Distributors, Engineers, Electrical Contractors, Showrooms and Industrial End Users in the states we cover.

NAICS: 424
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rexel

13, Boulevard du Fort de Vaux, Paris, รŽle-de-France, FR, 75017
Last Update: 2025-09-25 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Rexel, worldwide expert in the multichannel professional distribution of products and services for the energy world, addresses three main markets: residential, commercial, and industrial. The Group supports its residential, commercial, and industrial customers by providing a tailored and scalable range of products and services in energy management for construction, renovation, production, and maintenance. Rexel operates through a network of more than 1,950 branches in 17 countries, with more than 27,000 employees. The Groupโ€™s sales were โ‚ฌ19.3 billion in 2024.

NAICS: 42
NAICS Definition: Wholesale Trade
Employees: 17,007
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pioneer-sales-group-inc.jpeg
Pioneer Sales Group, Inc.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rexel.jpeg
Rexel
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Pioneer Sales Group, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rexel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pioneer Sales Group, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rexel in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Pioneer Sales Group, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pioneer Sales Group, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Rexel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rexel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pioneer-sales-group-inc.jpeg
Pioneer Sales Group, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rexel.jpeg
Rexel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pioneer Sales Group, Inc. company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Rexel company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rexel company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pioneer Sales Group, Inc. company.

In the current year, Rexel company and Pioneer Sales Group, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rexel company nor Pioneer Sales Group, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rexel company nor Pioneer Sales Group, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rexel company nor Pioneer Sales Group, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pioneer Sales Group, Inc. company nor Rexel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Rexel company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pioneer Sales Group, Inc. company.

Rexel company employs more people globally than Pioneer Sales Group, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Wholesale.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability exists in the error handling mechanism of the login page, where malicious scripts embedded in server hostnames are executed in the victim's browser context without proper sanitization. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A Denial of Dervice vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability permits an unauthenticated actor to crash the application through the submission of specially crafted Unicode input, requiring no prior authentication or privileges. The flaw manifests when Unicode tag characters are submitted to the Server field on the login page. The application fails to properly handle these characters during the ASCII conversion process, resulting in an unhandled exception that terminates the application within four to five seconds of submission. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. An open redirect exists in versions 5.13.2 and below via the redir parameter on .within.website when Weblate is configured with Anubis and REDIRECT_DOMAINS is not set. An attacker can craft a URL on the legitimate domain that redirects a victim to an attacker-controlled site. The redirect can also be used to initiate drive-by downloads (redirecting to a URL that serves a malicious file), increasing the risk to end users. This issue is fixed in version 5.13.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Termix is a web-based server management platform with SSH terminal, tunneling, and file editing capabilities. The official Docker image for Termix versions 1.5.0 and below, due to being configured with an Nginx reverse proxy, causes the backend to retrieve the proxy's IP instead of the client's IP when using the req.ip method. This results in isLocalhost always returning True. Consequently, the /ssh/db/host/internal endpoint can be accessed directly without login or authentication. This endpoint records the system's stored SSH host information, including addresses, usernames, and passwords, posing an extremely high security risk. Users who use the official Termix docker image, build their own image using the official dockerfile, or utilize reverse proxy functionality will be affected by this vulnerability. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OpenPLC_V3 has a vulnerability in the enipThread function that occurs due to the lack of a return value. This leads to a crash when the server loop ends and execution hits an illegal ud2 instruction. This issue can be triggered remotely without authentication by starting the same server multiple times or if the server exits unexpectedly. The vulnerability allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) against the PLC runtime, stopping any PC started remotely without authentication. This results in the PLC process crashing and halting all automation or control logic managed by OpenPLC.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X