Comparison Overview

PIOLINK

VS

TotalServices

PIOLINK

IT Castle 1-40, 550-1 Gasan-dong,, Seoul, 153-768, KR
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.PIOLINK.com

PIOLINK is a leading application networking (as known as ADC)company in Korea. it provides Application switch(L4/7) and Web Application Firewall products modeled PAS and WEBFRONT series in providing solutions to help individuals and enterprises, assures the stability, scalability, speed, and security of the network system with load balancing, QoS, Firewall, and packet filtering functions. In addition, PIOLINK is making most of efforts to manufacture application switches through steady research and development, and continuously introduces variety of high-performance network equipment based on existing technology.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

TotalServices

None
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.totalservicesuk.com

With over 18 years experience in computers, network support and design, software installation and upgrades, as well as hardware troubleshooting and maintenance, we can provide all the services you need to get your home computer or your company system running smoothly in no time. TotalServices supply, mainrtain and install computer systems, telephone systems and equipment for all types of business and home use. We cover London, Essex, Kent and the South of England areas. For businesses, we can start the job from the ground up, supplying equipment, cabling the premises if needed, right through to installing and configuring workstations, servers and any other equipment that you may require. For home, we can install wireless networks, wired networks through your existing mains supply and install and configure complete home shared internet access. We have fully trained, qualified and certified staff for all your requirements whether large or small.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/piolink.jpeg
PIOLINK
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/totalservices.jpeg
TotalServices
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PIOLINK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TotalServices
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PIOLINK in 2026.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TotalServices in 2026.

Incident History — PIOLINK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PIOLINK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TotalServices (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TotalServices cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/piolink.jpeg
PIOLINK
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/totalservices.jpeg
TotalServices
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PIOLINK company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TotalServices company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TotalServices company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PIOLINK company.

In the current year, TotalServices company and PIOLINK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TotalServices company nor PIOLINK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TotalServices company nor PIOLINK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TotalServices company nor PIOLINK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PIOLINK company nor TotalServices company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PIOLINK nor TotalServices holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PIOLINK company nor TotalServices company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PIOLINK company employs more people globally than TotalServices company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither PIOLINK nor TotalServices holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PIOLINK nor TotalServices holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PIOLINK nor TotalServices holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PIOLINK nor TotalServices holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PIOLINK nor TotalServices holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PIOLINK nor TotalServices holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References