Comparison Overview

PIOLINK

VS

FAYAT IT

PIOLINK

IT Castle 1-40, 550-1 Gasan-dong,, Seoul, 153-768, KR
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.PIOLINK.com

PIOLINK is a leading application networking (as known as ADC)company in Korea. it provides Application switch(L4/7) and Web Application Firewall products modeled PAS and WEBFRONT series in providing solutions to help individuals and enterprises, assures the stability, scalability, speed, and security of the network system with load balancing, QoS, Firewall, and packet filtering functions. In addition, PIOLINK is making most of efforts to manufacture application switches through steady research and development, and continuously introduces variety of high-performance network equipment based on existing technology.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

FAYAT IT

13 Rue Letellier, Bordeaux, 33100, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
https://fayatit.fayat.com/fr

Depuis 2009, FAYAT IT apporte ses services à plus de 11 000 utilisateurs répartis dans les divisions du Groupe FAYAT (Bâtiment, Travaux Publics, Fondations, Energie Services, Métal, Chaudronnerie et Matériel routier hors BOMAG) en France et à l’international. + Les services sont : - Le support des utilisateurs - La gestion de leur poste de travail - La gestion des sites, agences et chantiers - L’administration des systèmes et réseaux (infrastructure, droits d’accès, système de messagerie, serveurs et réseaux) - La gestion des projets techniques - La gestion des projets fonctionnels et maintenance. + Nos missions : - Assurer une qualité de service à la dimension d'un Groupe d'international - Définir et mettre en œuvre la stratégie informatique du Groupe - Accompagner les entreprises dans les chantiers de transformation numérique et de digitalisation. + Nos valeurs : Autonomie, engagement, audace, cohésion, confiance, esprit d'équipe. + COUVERTURE GÉOGRAPHIQUE > 2 Sites majeurs : Bordeaux (33) / Massy (91) > 17 Sites de proximité : Bordeaux, Colomiers, Cuincy, Fleurance, Lambersart, Anthon, Marly, Migennes, Nantes, Nice, Parthenay, Rennes, Saclay, St Georges d’Orques, Tours, Toul, Viry-Châtillon,

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 106
Subsidiaries: 36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/piolink.jpeg
PIOLINK
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fayat-it.jpeg
FAYAT IT
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PIOLINK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FAYAT IT
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PIOLINK in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FAYAT IT in 2025.

Incident History — PIOLINK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PIOLINK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FAYAT IT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FAYAT IT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/piolink.jpeg
PIOLINK
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fayat-it.jpeg
FAYAT IT
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PIOLINK company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FAYAT IT company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, FAYAT IT company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PIOLINK company.

In the current year, FAYAT IT company and PIOLINK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FAYAT IT company nor PIOLINK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FAYAT IT company nor PIOLINK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FAYAT IT company nor PIOLINK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PIOLINK company nor FAYAT IT company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PIOLINK nor FAYAT IT holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

FAYAT IT company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PIOLINK company.

FAYAT IT company employs more people globally than PIOLINK company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither PIOLINK nor FAYAT IT holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PIOLINK nor FAYAT IT holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PIOLINK nor FAYAT IT holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PIOLINK nor FAYAT IT holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PIOLINK nor FAYAT IT holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PIOLINK nor FAYAT IT holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References