Comparison Overview

Pinnacle Data Systems

VS

RPI Printing

Pinnacle Data Systems

25 Crestridge Drive, Suwanee, Georgia, US, 30024
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.doxim.com

Pinnacle Data Systems (PDS) is your multi-channel delivery solutions partner. We go beyond ordinary to manage and deliver millions of print and electronic documents every month. PDS provides highly effective delivery of business critical documents for many Fortune 500 financial services, trust, utility, healthcare, insurance, collection and telecommunication companies. Our service, equipment and technology collaborate to deliver millions of envelopes and host additional millions of web documents annually. PDS has invested millions of dollars in technology and process improvements including full color, an online portal for document content control, approval, reporting, and archive, along with a robust electronic document presentment and delivery solution. Our redundant sites provide inherent Business Continuity Planning and we recently completed an SSAE16 SOC II audit and certification.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

RPI Printing

135 Waldron Road, Fall River, MA, 02720, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://rpiprinting.com

Since 1988, RPI has been exceeding customer expectations. From short-run business card jobs to corporate brochures, projects with seemingly impossible deadlines to those with routine delivery requirements…every job is important. Our presses carry the best names in the industry: Komori & Xerox. But even the best equipment cannot ensure quality. It takes craftsmanship, experience and commitment to surpass industry standard. From estimation to delivery, every step in the process is designed to provide you with the best experience possible and to deliver a product to you that is above industry standard.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinnacle-data-systems-doxim.jpeg
Pinnacle Data Systems
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rpi-printing.jpeg
RPI Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pinnacle Data Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RPI Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pinnacle Data Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RPI Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Pinnacle Data Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pinnacle Data Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RPI Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RPI Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinnacle-data-systems-doxim.jpeg
Pinnacle Data Systems
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rpi-printing.jpeg
RPI Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RPI Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pinnacle Data Systems company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Pinnacle Data Systems company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas RPI Printing company has not reported any.

In the current year, RPI Printing company and Pinnacle Data Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RPI Printing company nor Pinnacle Data Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Pinnacle Data Systems company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other RPI Printing company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither RPI Printing company nor Pinnacle Data Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pinnacle Data Systems company nor RPI Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pinnacle Data Systems nor RPI Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pinnacle Data Systems company nor RPI Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pinnacle Data Systems company employs more people globally than RPI Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Pinnacle Data Systems nor RPI Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pinnacle Data Systems nor RPI Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pinnacle Data Systems nor RPI Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pinnacle Data Systems nor RPI Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pinnacle Data Systems nor RPI Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pinnacle Data Systems nor RPI Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References