Comparison Overview

Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3)

VS

Live Again

Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3)

1964 Howell Branch Rd, Winter Park, Florida, 32792, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20

Pinnacle Counseling Institute exists to help end emotional and relational suffering with our clients and partners! We are honored and humbled to walk on the journey of personal transformation and evolution towards health and abundance with our clients. We invite partners, both individuals and organizations, to do the same by making tax deductible donations that help Pinnacle provide high quality counseling that is both affordable and accessible.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Live Again

1250 E. Burnside St., Portland, OR, 97214, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Live Again Through workshops, trainings, and resources we will be able to reach communities (ex. schools, workplaces, churches) and change the statistics on suicide. Someone in America dies by suicide every 13.7 minutes. For each suicide at least 6 people are intimately affected by the loss. Live Again wants to change the statistics on suicide by cultivating stronger communities. For every person struggling we want at least 6 people in their lives to be ready, willing, and comfortable to start a healthy conversation that leads to healing and further resources. Portland: Live Again's reach will be national, but efforts will begin in the city of Portland, Oregon. The city has consistently ranked high for suicide rates. A 2013 Portland Police Press Release shed light on the issue of suicide. Portland suicide rate is 25% higher than the national, with 34.4 suicides per 100,000 people. The deaths by suicide exceed the number of traffic fatalities and homicides combined. Portland also has a very social and community based city scape that Live Again believes will allow efforts to be embraced quickly and multiplied.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinnacle-counseling-institute.jpeg
Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/live-again.jpeg
Live Again
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Live Again
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Live Again in 2026.

Incident History — Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Live Again (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Live Again cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinnacle-counseling-institute.jpeg
Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/live-again.jpeg
Live Again
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Live Again company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Live Again company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) company.

In the current year, Live Again company and Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Live Again company nor Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Live Again company nor Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Live Again company nor Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) company nor Live Again company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) nor Live Again holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) company nor Live Again company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) company employs more people globally than Live Again company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) nor Live Again holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) nor Live Again holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) nor Live Again holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) nor Live Again holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) nor Live Again holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pinnacle Counseling Institute, Inc. 501 (c)(3) nor Live Again holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N