Comparison Overview

Pink Cornrows

VS

ECDPM ๐ŸŒ

Pink Cornrows

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Founded in 2019, Pink Cornrows is a Black-femme led global leader in creating spaces for equity, safety and human-centered cultures. Our clients range from tech to Broadway and everything in between, as we support leaders and decision makers make the necessary steps to โ€œequifyโ€ their organizations. As practitioners, we also host the annual Black Policy Lab to engage experts, community and advocates as equal partners in policy design. Learn more about us at pinkcornrows.com.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ECDPM ๐ŸŒ

Onze Lieve Vrouweplein 21, Maastricht, undefined, 6211 HE, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

ECDPM is an independent and non-partisan โ€˜think and do tankโ€™ focusing on international cooperation and development policy in Europe and Africa. Our main areas of work include peace and security, migration, governance in Africa, food security, economic transformation and EU external affairs. Our more than 70 staff members from over 25 countries worldwide provide independent research, advice and practical support to policymakers, advisors and practitioners in Europe, Africa and beyond โ€“ in order to make policies work for sustainable and inclusive global development.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pink-cornrows.jpeg
Pink Cornrows
โ€”
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ecdpm.jpeg
ECDPM ๐ŸŒ
โ€”
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pink Cornrows
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ECDPM ๐ŸŒ
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pink Cornrows in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ECDPM ๐ŸŒ in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Pink Cornrows (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pink Cornrows cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” ECDPM ๐ŸŒ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ECDPM ๐ŸŒ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pink-cornrows.jpeg
Pink Cornrows
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ecdpm.jpeg
ECDPM ๐ŸŒ
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pink Cornrows company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pink Cornrows company.

In the current year, ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company and Pink Cornrows company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company nor Pink Cornrows company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company nor Pink Cornrows company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company nor Pink Cornrows company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pink Cornrows company nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pink Cornrows nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pink Cornrows company nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company employs more people globally than Pink Cornrows company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Pink Cornrows nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pink Cornrows nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pink Cornrows nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pink Cornrows nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pink Cornrows nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pink Cornrows nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X