Comparison Overview

Pinduoduo

VS

Synechron

Pinduoduo

533 Loushanguan Rd, Arch Tower II, Changning District, 28th Fl, Shanghai, Shanghai, CN, None
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Pinduoduo is a mobile-only marketplace that connects millions of agricultural producers with consumers across China. Pinduoduo aims to bring more businesses and people into the digital economy so that local communities can benefit from the increased productivity and convenience through new market opportunities.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1,993
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Synechron

11 Times Square, Suite 3301, New York, NY, US, 10036
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849

At Synechron, we believe in the power of digital to transform businesses for the better. Our global consulting firm combines creativity and innovative technology to deliver industry-leading digital solutions. Synechron’s progressive technologies and optimization strategies span end-to-end Artificial Intelligence, Consulting, Digital, Cloud & DevOps, Data, and Software Engineering, servicing an array of noteworthy financial services and technology firms. Through research and development initiatives in our FinLabs we develop solutions for modernization, from Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain to Data Science models, Digital Underwriting, mobile-first applications and more. Over the last 20+ years, our company has been honored with multiple employer awards, recognizing our commitment to our talented teams. With top clients to boast about, Synechron has a global workforce of 14,000+, and has 55 offices in 20 countries within key global markets. For more information on the company, please visit our website:www.synechron.com.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 14,201
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinduoduoinc.jpeg
Pinduoduo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/synechron.jpeg
Synechron
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pinduoduo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Synechron
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pinduoduo in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Synechron in 2025.

Incident History — Pinduoduo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pinduoduo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Synechron (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Synechron cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinduoduoinc.jpeg
Pinduoduo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/synechron.jpeg
Synechron
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pinduoduo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Synechron company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Synechron company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pinduoduo company.

In the current year, Synechron company and Pinduoduo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Synechron company nor Pinduoduo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Synechron company nor Pinduoduo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Synechron company nor Pinduoduo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pinduoduo company nor Synechron company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Synechron holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pinduoduo company nor Synechron company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Synechron company employs more people globally than Pinduoduo company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Synechron holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Synechron holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Synechron holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Synechron holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Synechron holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Synechron holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N