Comparison Overview

Pinduoduo

VS

Meesho

Pinduoduo

533 Loushanguan Rd, Arch Tower II, Changning District, 28th Fl, Shanghai, Shanghai, CN, None
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Pinduoduo is a mobile-only marketplace that connects millions of agricultural producers with consumers across China. Pinduoduo aims to bring more businesses and people into the digital economy so that local communities can benefit from the increased productivity and convenience through new market opportunities.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1,993
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Meesho

WeWork, Vaishnavi Signature, 78/9, Outer Ring Road, Bellandur Village Varthur Hobli Bengaluru East Ground Floor, WeWork, Vaishnavi Signature, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560103
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Meesho is India’s fastest growing internet commerce company. We want to make eCommerce accessible to all. Our vision is to enable 100 million small businesses in India, including individual entrepreneurs, to succeed online. Our mission is to democratise internet commerce by bringing a range of products & new customers online. What started as a reseller-focused platform six years ago has now emerged as a single ecosystem connecting millions of sellers, consumers and entrepreneurs. Want to know more. Check us out on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Meesho_Official

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19,454
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinduoduoinc.jpeg
Pinduoduo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meesho.jpeg
Meesho
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pinduoduo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Meesho
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pinduoduo in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meesho in 2025.

Incident History — Pinduoduo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pinduoduo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Meesho (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meesho cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinduoduoinc.jpeg
Pinduoduo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meesho.jpeg
Meesho
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pinduoduo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Meesho company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Meesho company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pinduoduo company.

In the current year, Meesho company and Pinduoduo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Meesho company nor Pinduoduo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Meesho company nor Pinduoduo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Meesho company nor Pinduoduo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pinduoduo company nor Meesho company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Meesho holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pinduoduo company nor Meesho company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Meesho company employs more people globally than Pinduoduo company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Meesho holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Meesho holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Meesho holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Meesho holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Meesho holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Meesho holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N