Comparison Overview

Pinduoduo

VS

Jumia Group

Pinduoduo

533 Loushanguan Rd, Arch Tower II, Changning District, 28th Fl, Shanghai, Shanghai, CN, None
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Pinduoduo is a mobile-only marketplace that connects millions of agricultural producers with consumers across China. Pinduoduo aims to bring more businesses and people into the digital economy so that local communities can benefit from the increased productivity and convenience through new market opportunities.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1,993
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jumia Group

109 Adeniyi Jones, Ikeja , Lagos, 1234, NG
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Jumia (NYSE :JMIA) is a leading e-commerce platform in Africa. It is built around a marketplace, Jumia Logistics, and JumiaPay. The marketplace helps millions of consumers and sellers to connect and transact. Jumia Logistics enables the delivery of millions of packages through our network of local partners. JumiaPay facilitates the payments of online transactions for Jumia's ecosystem. With over 1 billion people and 500 million internet users in Africa, Jumia believes that e-commerce is making people's lives easier by helping them shop and pay for millions of products at the best prices wherever they live. E-commerce is also creating new opportunities for SMEs to grow, and job opportunities for a new generation to thrive. With over 5,000 employees in more than 10 countries in Africa, Jumia is led by top talented leaders offering a great mix of local and international talents and is backed by very high-profile shareholders. Jumia is committed to creating sustainable impact in Africa. Jumia offers unique opportunities in a vibrant and booming environment, creating new jobs, new skills, and empowering a new generation.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12,144
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinduoduoinc.jpeg
Pinduoduo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jumia-group.jpeg
Jumia Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pinduoduo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jumia Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pinduoduo in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jumia Group in 2025.

Incident History — Pinduoduo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pinduoduo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jumia Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jumia Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinduoduoinc.jpeg
Pinduoduo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jumia-group.jpeg
Jumia Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pinduoduo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jumia Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jumia Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pinduoduo company.

In the current year, Jumia Group company and Pinduoduo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jumia Group company nor Pinduoduo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jumia Group company nor Pinduoduo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jumia Group company nor Pinduoduo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pinduoduo company nor Jumia Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Jumia Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Jumia Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pinduoduo company.

Jumia Group company employs more people globally than Pinduoduo company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Jumia Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Jumia Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Jumia Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Jumia Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Jumia Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Jumia Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N