Comparison Overview

Pinduoduo

VS

Binance

Pinduoduo

533 Loushanguan Rd, Arch Tower II, Changning District, 28th Fl, Shanghai, Shanghai, CN, None
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Pinduoduo is a mobile-only marketplace that connects millions of agricultural producers with consumers across China. Pinduoduo aims to bring more businesses and people into the digital economy so that local communities can benefit from the increased productivity and convenience through new market opportunities.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1,993
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Binance

Everywhere, OO, 0
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 600 and 649

Binance is the world’s leading blockchain ecosystem and cryptocurrency infrastructure provider with a product suite that includes the world's largest digital asset exchange and much more. Trusted by over 200 millions of users worldwide, the Binance platform is dedicated to increasing the freedom of money for users, and features an unmatched portfolio of crypto products and offerings, including: trading and finance, education, data and research, social good, investment and incubation, decentralization and infrastructure solutions, and more. Posts are not directed towards UK users.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 12,628
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinduoduoinc.jpeg
Pinduoduo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/binance.jpeg
Binance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pinduoduo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Binance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pinduoduo in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Binance in 2025.

Incident History — Pinduoduo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pinduoduo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Binance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Binance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinduoduoinc.jpeg
Pinduoduo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/binance.jpeg
Binance
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Motivation: Money Laundering, Tax Evasion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Breach
Motivation: Money Laundering, Tax Evasion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Pinduoduo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Binance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Binance company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Pinduoduo company has not reported any.

In the current year, Binance company and Pinduoduo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Binance company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Pinduoduo company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Binance company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Pinduoduo company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Binance company nor Pinduoduo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pinduoduo company nor Binance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Binance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Binance company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pinduoduo company.

Binance company employs more people globally than Pinduoduo company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Binance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Binance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Binance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Binance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Binance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Binance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N