Comparison Overview

Pigott

VS

Charles & Charles

Pigott

3815 Ingersoll Avenue, Des Moines, IA, 50312, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

As a Certified MillerKnoll Dealer, Pigott is Iowa and South Dakota's premiere source for commercial interior design solutions, specializing in corporate, healthcare, government & education interiors. MillerKnoll 2023 Platinum Award Winner When people are inspired by place, anything is possible. An environment powered by human-centered design can spark potential and drive prosperity. People-First Approach We apply proven insights about the connection between people and place to enhance engagement and boost performance. Result-Driven Design From understanding your aspirations to exceptional implementation, we’llwork together to create elevated places that drive success. Forward-Thinking Solutions With our innovative place-making solutions and broad product offering, your space will fuel results now—and long into the future.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 135
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Charles & Charles

5830 Rodeo Rd, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90016
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Charles & Charles has been in the furniture industry for the past 40 years, exclusively serving interior designers and set decorators from all over the United States. The 60,000 square feet showroom is stocked full of European antique and reproduction furniture and accessories. Call (310)559-0138 or Register Online with Charles & Charles today and begin a professional and rewarding relationship with a company that strives to provide the best possible quality products and outstanding client service.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pigott-inc-.jpeg
Pigott
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Charles & Charles
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pigott
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Charles & Charles
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pigott in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charles & Charles in 2025.

Incident History — Pigott (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pigott cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Charles & Charles (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charles & Charles cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pigott-inc-.jpeg
Pigott
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Charles & Charles
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Charles & Charles company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pigott company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Charles & Charles company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pigott company.

In the current year, Charles & Charles company and Pigott company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Charles & Charles company nor Pigott company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Charles & Charles company nor Pigott company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Charles & Charles company nor Pigott company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pigott company nor Charles & Charles company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pigott nor Charles & Charles holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pigott company nor Charles & Charles company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pigott company employs more people globally than Charles & Charles company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Pigott nor Charles & Charles holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pigott nor Charles & Charles holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pigott nor Charles & Charles holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pigott nor Charles & Charles holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pigott nor Charles & Charles holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pigott nor Charles & Charles holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.