Comparison Overview

Pif Magazine

VS

NYT Wirecutter

Pif Magazine

6115 NE 185th Street, Kenmore, WA, 98028, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Pif Magazine is one of the oldest, continually published literary zines online. Founded in 1995, the magazine has published original works by authors such as Amy Hempel, Julia Slavin, Richard Yates, and David Lehman, as well as interviews with modern literary greats like A. Manette Ansay, Naomi Shihab Nye, Jhumpa Lahiri, and William H. Gass.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NYT Wirecutter

12-01 44th Ave, New York, undefined, 11101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Wirecutter is the best product recommendation service in the U.S. We care deeply about obsessively testing and researching thousands of products every year to recommend the best of everything, saving readers time and stress in figuring out what to buy. Whatever sort of thing you need—tableware or TV or air purifier—we make shopping for it easy by telling you the best one to get. Our recommendations are made through vigorous reporting, interviewing, and testing by teams of veteran journalists, scientists, and researchers. We pride ourselves on following rigorous journalistic standards and ethics, and we maintain editorial independence from our business operations. Our recommendations are always made entirely by our editorial team without input from our revenue team, and our writers and editors are never made aware of any business relationships.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 213
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pif-magazine.jpeg
Pif Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nyt-wirecutter.jpeg
NYT Wirecutter
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pif Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NYT Wirecutter
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pif Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NYT Wirecutter in 2025.

Incident History — Pif Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pif Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NYT Wirecutter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NYT Wirecutter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pif-magazine.jpeg
Pif Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nyt-wirecutter.jpeg
NYT Wirecutter
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NYT Wirecutter company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pif Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NYT Wirecutter company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pif Magazine company.

In the current year, NYT Wirecutter company and Pif Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NYT Wirecutter company nor Pif Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NYT Wirecutter company nor Pif Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NYT Wirecutter company nor Pif Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pif Magazine company nor NYT Wirecutter company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pif Magazine nor NYT Wirecutter holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NYT Wirecutter company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pif Magazine company.

NYT Wirecutter company employs more people globally than Pif Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Pif Magazine nor NYT Wirecutter holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pif Magazine nor NYT Wirecutter holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pif Magazine nor NYT Wirecutter holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pif Magazine nor NYT Wirecutter holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pif Magazine nor NYT Wirecutter holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pif Magazine nor NYT Wirecutter holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.