Comparison Overview

Pidamos Marketing Total

VS

VML

Pidamos Marketing Total

Cra 18 # 93 -25 Bogota, Cundinamarca, CO
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
http://pidamos.com

Excellent

Más allá de dedicarnos al marketing, PIDAMOS es una agencia que se ha dedicado a brindar soluciones totales para clientes felices. Esto más que palabras, se ve reflejado en la forma de asumir el reto que significa cada producto, cada consumidor y cada cliente, todo a través de los pilares de servicio al cliente y trato humano, pero sobre todo con una metodología propia.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51-200
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

VML

3 WTC 175 Greenwich Street, New York, New York, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000
http://www.vml.com

VML is a global powerhouse born from the unification of Wunderman Thompson and VMLY&R — two of the world's most powerful and accomplished creative agencies with complementary capabilities and geographic strengths. We have an industry-unique opportunity to provide our client partners with a fully integrated offering across brand experience, customer experience and commerce practices — powered by deep data and technology experience. For more information, visit www.vml.com.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 29,887
Subsidiaries: 34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pidamos-marketing-total.jpeg
Pidamos Marketing Total
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vml.jpeg
VML
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Pidamos Marketing Total
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VML
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pidamos Marketing Total in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VML in 2025.

Incident History — Pidamos Marketing Total (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pidamos Marketing Total cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VML (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VML cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pidamos-marketing-total.jpeg
Pidamos Marketing Total
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vml.jpeg
VML
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Pidamos Marketing Total company and VML company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, VML company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pidamos Marketing Total company.

In the current year, VML company and Pidamos Marketing Total company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither VML company nor Pidamos Marketing Total company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither VML company nor Pidamos Marketing Total company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither VML company nor Pidamos Marketing Total company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pidamos Marketing Total company nor VML company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

VML company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pidamos Marketing Total company.

VML company employs more people globally than Pidamos Marketing Total company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreshRSS is a free, self-hostable RSS aggregator. Versions 1.26.3 and below do not sanitize certain event handler attributes in feed content, so by finding a page that renders feed entries without CSP, it is possible to execute an XSS payload. The Allow API access authentication setting needs to be enabled by the instance administrator beforehand for the attack to work as it relies on api/query.php. An account takeover is possible by sending a change password request via the XSS payload / setting UserJS for persistence / stealing the autofill password / displaying a phishing page with a spoofed URL using history.replaceState() If the victim is an administrator, the attacker can also perform administrative actions. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-29
Updated
Date
2025-09-29
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.

Published
Date
2025-09-29
Updated
Date
2025-09-29
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.8 and below, go-f3's justification verification caching mechanism has a vulnerability where verification results are cached without properly considering the context of the message. An attacker can bypass justification verification by submitting a valid message with a correct justification and then reusing the same cached justification in contexts where it would normally be invalid. This occurs because the cached verification does not properly validate the relationship between the justification and the specific message context it's being used with. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9.

Published
Date
2025-09-29
Updated
Date
2025-09-29
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
References
Description

mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin is an Mkdocs Markdown includer plugin. In versions 7.1.7 and below, there is a vulnerability where unvalidated input can collide with substitution placeholders. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.8.

Published
Date
2025-09-29
Updated
Date
2025-09-29
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
References
Description

go-mail is a comprehensive library for sending mails with Go. In versions 0.7.0 and below, due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, there is a possibility of wrong address routing or even ESMTP parameter smuggling. For successful exploitation, it is required that the user's code allows for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect users. This issue is fixed in version 0.7.1

Published
Date
2025-09-29
Updated
Date
2025-09-29
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References