Comparison Overview

Pidamos Marketing Total

VS

Interpublic Group (IPG)

Pidamos Marketing Total

Cra 18 # 93 -25 Bogota, Cundinamarca, CO
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Mรกs allรก de dedicarnos al marketing, PIDAMOS es una agencia que se ha dedicado a brindar soluciones totales para clientes felices. Esto mรกs que palabras, se ve reflejado en la forma de asumir el reto que significa cada producto, cada consumidor y cada cliente, todo a travรฉs de los pilares de servicio al cliente y trato humano, pero sobre todo con una metodologรญa propia.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51-200
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Interpublic Group (IPG)

909 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Interpublic (NYSE: IPG) is a values-based, data-fueled, and creatively-driven provider of marketing solutions. Home to some of the worldโ€™s best-known and most innovative communications specialists, IPG global brands include Acxiom, Craft, FCB, FutureBrand, Golin, Initiative, IPG Health, IPG Mediabrands, Jack Morton, KINESSO, MAGNA, McCann, Mediahub, Momentum, MRM, MullenLowe Global, Octagon, UM, Weber Shandwick and more. IPG is an S&P 500 company with total revenue of $10.7 billion in 2024.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 15,245
Subsidiaries: 36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pidamos-marketing-total.jpeg
Pidamos Marketing Total
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipg.jpeg
Interpublic Group (IPG)
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Pidamos Marketing Total
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Interpublic Group (IPG)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pidamos Marketing Total in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interpublic Group (IPG) in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Pidamos Marketing Total (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pidamos Marketing Total cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Interpublic Group (IPG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interpublic Group (IPG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pidamos-marketing-total.jpeg
Pidamos Marketing Total
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipg.jpeg
Interpublic Group (IPG)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Pidamos Marketing Total company and Interpublic Group (IPG) company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Interpublic Group (IPG) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pidamos Marketing Total company.

In the current year, Interpublic Group (IPG) company and Pidamos Marketing Total company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) company nor Pidamos Marketing Total company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) company nor Pidamos Marketing Total company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) company nor Pidamos Marketing Total company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pidamos Marketing Total company nor Interpublic Group (IPG) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Interpublic Group (IPG) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pidamos Marketing Total company.

Interpublic Group (IPG) company employs more people globally than Pidamos Marketing Total company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreshRSS is a free, self-hostable RSS aggregator. Versions 1.26.3 and below do not sanitize certain event handler attributes in feed content, so by finding a page that renders feed entries without CSP, it is possible to execute an XSS payload. The Allow API access authentication setting needs to be enabled by the instance administrator beforehand for the attack to work as it relies on api/query.php. An account takeover is possible by sending a change password request via the XSS payload / setting UserJS for persistence / stealing the autofill password / displaying a phishing page with a spoofed URL using history.replaceState() If the victim is an administrator, the attacker can also perform administrative actions. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.8 and below, go-f3's justification verification caching mechanism has a vulnerability where verification results are cached without properly considering the context of the message. An attacker can bypass justification verification by submitting a valid message with a correct justification and then reusing the same cached justification in contexts where it would normally be invalid. This occurs because the cached verification does not properly validate the relationship between the justification and the specific message context it's being used with. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Description

mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin is an Mkdocs Markdown includer plugin. In versions 7.1.7 and below, there is a vulnerability where unvalidated input can collide with substitution placeholders. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Description

go-mail is a comprehensive library for sending mails with Go. In versions 0.7.0 and below, due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, there is a possibility of wrong address routing or even ESMTP parameter smuggling. For successful exploitation, it is required that the user's code allows for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect users. This issue is fixed in version 0.7.1

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X