Comparison Overview

Pictage, Inc.

VS

Exum Photography

Pictage, Inc.

1580 Francisco St., Suite 101, Torrance, undefined, 90501, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 700 and 749

Pictage is the complete business solution for professional photographers. Thousands of successful photo studios rely on Pictage as a trusted partner. Our software platform lets you easily upload images and host online galleries, where your clients can proof, organize and share their photos. Clients and guests can buy directly through our e-commerce portal, or you can manage orders yourself through our wholesale purchasing system. We offer a variety of products, from high-quality prints and custom albums to canvases, wall art, greeting cards and more. Our team of experts can handle retouching, color-correction, printing, fulfillment and customer service, and our photo lab is dedicated to total quality assurance. Plus, we provide marketing services that increase your sales while giving you more time to grow your business.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Exum Photography

115 Avenue of Trees, Elon, North Carolina, 27244, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Exum Photography is a North Carolina based studio of photographers shooting for a mix of commercial and editorial clients. We produce both still and motion imagery. Under principal photographer Steve Exum is associate photographer Griffin Davis and associate graphic designer Kelsey Morgan. We collaborate with filmmaker Peyton Lea, of Peyton Lea Productions, to fulfill video needs for our clients. Exum and his associates work from a studio in Elon, NC near Greensboro. Our projects are shot all over North Carolina and beyond. Our photographers specialize in conceptual portraiture, fashion, architecture, home furnishings, product, industry, and photojournalistic wedding coverage.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pictage-inc..jpeg
Pictage, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exum-photography.jpeg
Exum Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pictage, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Exum Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pictage, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exum Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Pictage, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pictage, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Exum Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exum Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pictage-inc..jpeg
Pictage, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exum-photography.jpeg
Exum Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Exum Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pictage, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Exum Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pictage, Inc. company.

In the current year, Exum Photography company and Pictage, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Exum Photography company nor Pictage, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Exum Photography company nor Pictage, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Exum Photography company nor Pictage, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pictage, Inc. company nor Exum Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pictage, Inc. nor Exum Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pictage, Inc. company nor Exum Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pictage, Inc. company employs more people globally than Exum Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Pictage, Inc. nor Exum Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pictage, Inc. nor Exum Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pictage, Inc. nor Exum Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pictage, Inc. nor Exum Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pictage, Inc. nor Exum Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pictage, Inc. nor Exum Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N