Comparison Overview

Pick n Pay

VS

Sodimac

Pick n Pay

PnP Office Park, Kenilworth, Western Cape, 7708, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to Pick n Pay, where family values and customer-centricity converge to create an unparalleled shopping experience. Since 1967, when the visionary Raymond Ackerman championed the cause of consumers by acquiring the first few stores, the Ackerman family's dedication has steered our journey of growth and expansion. Today, Pick n Pay stands tall across South Africa, Namibia, Botswana, Zambia, Mozambique, Mauritius, Swaziland, and Lesotho, embodying our commitment to serving communities far and wide. Additionally, we proudly hold a 49% share in TM Supermarkets, a Zimbabwean retail giant, further extending our reach and impact. Our core offering spans groceries, clothing, and general merchandise, tailored to meet the diverse needs of our customers. But our dedication doesn't stop there. We go beyond the ordinary, offering value-added services that align with the evolving expectations of our patrons. The Group strives to address socio-economic challenges through the supply of high-quality, affordable food for all customers, while providing significant employment and economic opportunities across its value chain. To ensure utmost convenience and accessibility, Pick n Pay operates through various store formats, including both franchised and owned establishments. Whether you step into our stores for a quick grocery run or a leisurely shopping spree, expect nothing less than a seamless and enriching experience at Pick n Pay—the quintessential family store focused on you, our valued customer.

NAICS: 452
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26,655
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sodimac

Chile, Brasil, Perú, Argentina, Uruguay, Colombia, México, CL
Last Update: 2025-11-26

#SomosUnEquipo Te invitamos a conocer y a ser parte de nuestra Casa, un lugar donde la innovación, la sostenibilidad y la diversidad se viven día a día. Con más de 60 años de trayectoria y presencia en Chile, Perú, Colombia, Argentina, Brasil, Uruguay y México, nuestra compañía se enfoca en el mejoramiento del hogar, desarrollando soluciones únicas e innovadoras para nuestros clientes, mientras que nuestros equipos trabajan colaborativamente para cumplir nuestro Propósito: Simplificar y disfrutar más la vida. Somos parte de Falabella y ofrecemos grandes oportunidades de desarrollo profesional, movilidad y aprendizaje, así como también la experiencia de trabajar en uno de los principales conglomerados de Retail de América Latina. Súmate a nuestra Casa, súmate a Falabella. ¡Te esperamos! Falabella Corporativo: Chile – Perú - India Falabella Retail: Colombia - Chile - Perú Sodimac: Chile - México - Perú - Argentina - Colombia - Brasil - Uruguay Falabella Financiero: Chile - Perú - Colombia - México Falabella.com: Chile Linio: Perú - México - Chile - Colombia Tottus: Chile – Perú Falabella Inmobiliario: Chile - Perú Mall Plaza: Chile - Colombia - Perú

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 22,941
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pick-'n-pay.jpeg
Pick n Pay
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sodimac-chile.jpeg
Sodimac
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pick n Pay
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sodimac
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pick n Pay in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sodimac in 2025.

Incident History — Pick n Pay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pick n Pay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sodimac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sodimac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pick-'n-pay.jpeg
Pick n Pay
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sodimac-chile.jpeg
Sodimac
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sodimac company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pick n Pay company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sodimac company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pick n Pay company.

In the current year, Sodimac company and Pick n Pay company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sodimac company nor Pick n Pay company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sodimac company nor Pick n Pay company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sodimac company nor Pick n Pay company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pick n Pay company nor Sodimac company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pick n Pay nor Sodimac holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pick n Pay company nor Sodimac company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pick n Pay company employs more people globally than Sodimac company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Pick n Pay nor Sodimac holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pick n Pay nor Sodimac holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pick n Pay nor Sodimac holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pick n Pay nor Sodimac holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pick n Pay nor Sodimac holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pick n Pay nor Sodimac holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H