Comparison Overview

Photo Lab, Inc.

VS

California Print Co

Photo Lab, Inc.

1026 Redna Terrace, Cincinnati, Ohio 45215, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Photo Lab, Inc. (Pli) opened in 1975 providing quality photographic development services to professional photographers in downtown Cincinnati, Ohio. In the early 1980's Pli moved into the digital age and relocated to a larger 30,000 sq.ft. building in a suburb of Cincinnati called Woodlawn. The facility is designed to accommodate large format visuals, while our extensive imaging services have grown over the years to encompass such specialties as grand format printing, dye sublimation, direct-to-press printing, computer graphic assembly, and a variety of digital imaging processes. We also provide finishing services in mounting, laminating, postscript end routing, fabric finishing, as well as paint and powder coatings. Pli has been providing museum quality graphics and digital imaging for four decades. Pli is a family owned company currently being managed by the third generation. Most of our key personnel have been with us for many years.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

California Print Co

8955 DE SOTO AVE, Canoga Park, California 91304, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

California Print Company is the expert in screen printing, embroidery, direct-to-garment printing on t-shirts, uniforms, polo’s and more! Located in the San Fernando Valley, we’re a great source for all of your garment design needs in the Los Angeles area. Our graphic artists can also help you with your graphic design needs. Get a quote today for Silkscreen, Embroidery or Direct to Garment printing! Low minimums, rush service available.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/photo-lab-inc-.jpeg
Photo Lab, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-print-co.jpeg
California Print Co
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Photo Lab, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
California Print Co
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Photo Lab, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for California Print Co in 2025.

Incident History — Photo Lab, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Photo Lab, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — California Print Co (X = Date, Y = Severity)

California Print Co cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/photo-lab-inc-.jpeg
Photo Lab, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-print-co.jpeg
California Print Co
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Photo Lab, Inc. company and California Print Co company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, California Print Co company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Photo Lab, Inc. company.

In the current year, California Print Co company and Photo Lab, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither California Print Co company nor Photo Lab, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither California Print Co company nor Photo Lab, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither California Print Co company nor Photo Lab, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Photo Lab, Inc. company nor California Print Co company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Photo Lab, Inc. nor California Print Co holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Photo Lab, Inc. company nor California Print Co company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Photo Lab, Inc. company employs more people globally than California Print Co company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Photo Lab, Inc. nor California Print Co holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Photo Lab, Inc. nor California Print Co holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Photo Lab, Inc. nor California Print Co holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Photo Lab, Inc. nor California Print Co holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Photo Lab, Inc. nor California Print Co holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Photo Lab, Inc. nor California Print Co holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N