Comparison Overview

Phoenix RCO, Inc.

VS

Sedera

Phoenix RCO, Inc.

None, None, Austell, GA, US, 30106
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Phoenix is an independent non-profit organization called a Recovery Community Organization or RCO. An RCO is led and governed by representatives of local communities of recovery from addiction, mental illness, or both. There are currently 39 RCOs open in different stages of development in the state of Georgia. Generally, RCOs provide peer-based recovery support services (P-BRSS), carry out recovery-focused community education and outreach programs, and organize recovery-focused policy advocacy activities. All these activities are available to everyone in the community and are not restricted to individuals enrolled in specific educational, treatment, or residential programs. Our mission is to provide no-cost recovery services from substance-use disorder for individuals, and families; and to provide a safe, supportive and non-judgmental space that stimulates growth, provides resources, and hosts recovery-oriented activities that will support long-term recovery. We envision: individuals with addictive disease changing their lives by growing individual recovery capital with extensive resources and a long-term recovery community; people in recovery creating lasting transformational change through multiple pathways to recovery; groups of peers in recovery, safe friends, supportive family members, and compassionate community members seeking positive healing relationships; a safe place for people seeking to initiate or sustain their recovery to nurture new and enduring lifestyles of healthy behaviors and activities; and a community that sees Phoenix as a staple for recovery-related services and referrals. We value advocacy, community, compassion, growth, integrity, respect, service and support. Specifically, Phoenix RCO hopes to serve the South Cobb County Community in the following ways: we can currently help someone in active addiction find a detox, rehab, or sober-living program appropriate in length and cost to their individual need as well as support services fo

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sedera

7171 Southwest Pkwy Building 300, Austin, Texas, 78735, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Health insurance isn’t the only way to pay for healthcare. The Sedera Medical Cost Sharing Community is a nonprofit that offers a non-insurance approach for managing large and unexpected medical expenses. Sedera is the change that we all want to see: a simple, transparent alternative to the broken and overly complicated health insurance industry. Sedera leads with years of industry knowledge and integrity and provides a best-in-class, Member-focused medical cost sharing experience. Sedera is inclusive and welcomes people from all walks of life who agree with and commit to the ethical beliefs and principles of the Community. Members are individuals who are active and engaged participants in their healthcare decision-making, dedicated to a healthy lifestyle, and united by shared values. Sedera is an affordable alternative to the high costs of health insurance that provides price transparency, freedom of choice, and peace of mind when paying for healthcare. There are membership options for every budget, no network restrictions, membership is not tied to employment, and you can enroll at any time. Our Member Service Advisors are Medical Cost Sharing experts and provide exceptional, personalized Member support. Feel free to reach out at any time. We’re happy to answer your questions!

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phoenixrco.jpeg
Phoenix RCO, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sedera-health.jpeg
Sedera
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Phoenix RCO, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sedera
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phoenix RCO, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sedera in 2025.

Incident History — Phoenix RCO, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phoenix RCO, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sedera (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sedera cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phoenixrco.jpeg
Phoenix RCO, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sedera-health.jpeg
Sedera
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sedera company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Phoenix RCO, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sedera company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Phoenix RCO, Inc. company.

In the current year, Sedera company and Phoenix RCO, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sedera company nor Phoenix RCO, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sedera company nor Phoenix RCO, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sedera company nor Phoenix RCO, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Phoenix RCO, Inc. company nor Sedera company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Phoenix RCO, Inc. nor Sedera holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Phoenix RCO, Inc. company nor Sedera company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sedera company employs more people globally than Phoenix RCO, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Phoenix RCO, Inc. nor Sedera holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Phoenix RCO, Inc. nor Sedera holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Phoenix RCO, Inc. nor Sedera holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Phoenix RCO, Inc. nor Sedera holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Phoenix RCO, Inc. nor Sedera holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Phoenix RCO, Inc. nor Sedera holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H