Comparison Overview

Phoenix International Publications, Inc.

VS

Brown Political Review

Phoenix International Publications, Inc.

8501 West Higgins Road, Chicago, Illinois, 60631, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pikidsmedia.com/

At Phoenix International Publications (PIP), we are committed to crafting engaging, educational, and entertaining books and toys for children. We create a wide range of original and licensed sound books, song books, picture books, board books, apps, and activity books, all of which encourage a lifelong love of story time and imaginative play. PIP is comprised of book imprints PI Kids, Sunbird Books, Sequoia Children's Publishing, Sequoia Kids Media, and Cardinal Media. PIP is based in Chicago, Illinois with offices worldwide. Named a worldwide leading licensee by License Global magazine, PIP has been a division of Phoenix Publishing & Media Group (PPMG), Inc. since 2014 and has been publishing books for over three decades.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Brown Political Review

8 Fones Alley, Providence, 02912, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.brownpoliticalreview.org

Brown Political Review is the nation's leading undergraduate journal of public policy and political theory. Founded in 2012, the magazine brings a rigorous, fact-based approach to analyzing domestic and international politics. Brown Political Review is supported by the Political Theory Project, an interdisciplinary program at Brown University that supports faculty associates, postdoctoral associates, and undergraduate groups in an effort to promote vibrant and rigorous discourse in academics and politics.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 148
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phoenix-international-publications-inc.jpeg
Phoenix International Publications, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brown-political-review.jpeg
Brown Political Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Phoenix International Publications, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brown Political Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phoenix International Publications, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brown Political Review in 2025.

Incident History — Phoenix International Publications, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phoenix International Publications, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brown Political Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brown Political Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phoenix-international-publications-inc.jpeg
Phoenix International Publications, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brown-political-review.jpeg
Brown Political Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Phoenix International Publications, Inc. company and Brown Political Review company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Brown Political Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Phoenix International Publications, Inc. company.

In the current year, Brown Political Review company and Phoenix International Publications, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brown Political Review company nor Phoenix International Publications, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brown Political Review company nor Phoenix International Publications, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brown Political Review company nor Phoenix International Publications, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Phoenix International Publications, Inc. company nor Brown Political Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Phoenix International Publications, Inc. nor Brown Political Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Phoenix International Publications, Inc. company nor Brown Political Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Brown Political Review company employs more people globally than Phoenix International Publications, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Phoenix International Publications, Inc. nor Brown Political Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Phoenix International Publications, Inc. nor Brown Political Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Phoenix International Publications, Inc. nor Brown Political Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Phoenix International Publications, Inc. nor Brown Political Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Phoenix International Publications, Inc. nor Brown Political Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Phoenix International Publications, Inc. nor Brown Political Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References