Comparison Overview

Phoenix Inks and Coatings

VS

KC Printing Services, Inc.

Phoenix Inks and Coatings

20w267 101st Street, Lemont, 60439-9672, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://phxinks.com

Phoenix Inks and Coatings has been a standard for Printing Inks and Coatings within the printing industry. We strive every day to keep an edge on the printing market as well as creating new unique products. ​Phoenix Inks is determined to remain the standard for quality inks and coatings for many years to come. If you or someone you know has a new product in mind or would like to choose from one of our many quality products, please don’t hesitate to let us know! ​We are here to make your business work!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

KC Printing Services, Inc.

22292 N Pepper Rd, Lake Barrington, Illinois, 60010, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kcprint.com

We do more than put ink on paper & apparel. We turn heads with advanced features and new materials. We lower costs with streamlined processes and digital management. We also deliver results with cutting-edge solutions. With a broad range of traditional and digital printing services, KC Printing can help you make your mark. We provide a wide range of dimensional media including: apparel, appreciation gifts, banners, brochures, business cards, coasters, dye sublimation, embroidery, every door direct mailers (EDDM), flyers, koozies, laser engraving, name badges, newsletters, posters, screen printing, uniforms, wedding invitations, yard signs, and many more promotional items.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phoenix-inks-and-coatings.jpeg
Phoenix Inks and Coatings
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kc-printing-services.jpeg
KC Printing Services, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Phoenix Inks and Coatings
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KC Printing Services, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phoenix Inks and Coatings in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KC Printing Services, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Phoenix Inks and Coatings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phoenix Inks and Coatings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KC Printing Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KC Printing Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phoenix-inks-and-coatings.jpeg
Phoenix Inks and Coatings
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kc-printing-services.jpeg
KC Printing Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Phoenix Inks and Coatings company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KC Printing Services, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, KC Printing Services, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Phoenix Inks and Coatings company.

In the current year, KC Printing Services, Inc. company and Phoenix Inks and Coatings company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KC Printing Services, Inc. company nor Phoenix Inks and Coatings company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KC Printing Services, Inc. company nor Phoenix Inks and Coatings company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KC Printing Services, Inc. company nor Phoenix Inks and Coatings company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Phoenix Inks and Coatings company nor KC Printing Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Phoenix Inks and Coatings nor KC Printing Services, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Phoenix Inks and Coatings company nor KC Printing Services, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Phoenix Inks and Coatings company employs more people globally than KC Printing Services, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Phoenix Inks and Coatings nor KC Printing Services, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Phoenix Inks and Coatings nor KC Printing Services, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Phoenix Inks and Coatings nor KC Printing Services, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Phoenix Inks and Coatings nor KC Printing Services, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Phoenix Inks and Coatings nor KC Printing Services, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Phoenix Inks and Coatings nor KC Printing Services, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References