Comparison Overview

Phoenix House Florida

VS

Sutter Health

Phoenix House Florida

510 Vonderburg Dr, Brandon, 33511, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 700 and 749

At Phoenix House Florida, we are continually striving to achieve positive outcomes and to ensure that we are helping build healthier communities. Our collective efforts are designed to ultimately lead our patients towards living a healthy, active, and purposeful life, free from addiction. Phoenix House Florida Outpatient in Brandon provides outpatient care for adults and for teens at the Derek Jeter Center. Our approach is rooted in evidence-based treatment, designed with a focus on strength to address the unique needs of each person and to deliver a superior level of care. At Phoenix House Florida in Citra, the Murray Women’s Residential Program provides trauma-informed, gender-specific treatment services. Our separate men’s program provides education and life-skills training for men re-entering the community. Patients engage in individual counseling, educational and clinical group sessions, wellness activities, life-skills training, and services to help ensure a sustained recovery. Office-based detoxification services are available for both men and women, and treatment length is tailored to meet each patient’s individual needs. Our campus in Citra includes a swimming pool, tennis and volleyball courts, a fitness trail, and workout equipment. Nestled in the scenic hills of Marion County, our residential treatment helps adults find the inner strength to sustain recovery.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Sutter Health

2200 River Plaza Drive, None, Sacramento, California, US, 95833
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 650 and 699

Sutter Health is a not-for-profit, people-centered healthcare system providing comprehensive care throughout California. Sutter Health is committed to innovative, high-quality patient care and community partnerships, and innovative, high-quality patient care. Today, Sutter Health is pursuing a bold new plan to reach more people and make excellent healthcare more connected and accessible. The health system’s 57,000+ staff and clinicians and 12,000+ affiliated physicians currently serve more than 3 million patients with a focus on expanding opportunities to serve patients, people and communities better. Sutter Health provides exceptional, affordable care through its hospitals, medical groups, ambulatory surgery centers, urgent care clinics, telehealth, home health and hospice services. Dedicated to transforming healthcare, at Sutter Health, getting better never stops. Learn more about how Sutter Health is transforming healthcare at sutterhealth.org and vitals.sutterhealth.org.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 23,594
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phoenix-house-florida.jpeg
Phoenix House Florida
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutter-health.jpeg
Sutter Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Phoenix House Florida
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sutter Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phoenix House Florida in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Sutter Health has 19.05% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Phoenix House Florida (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phoenix House Florida cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sutter Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sutter Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phoenix-house-florida.jpeg
Phoenix House Florida
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2021
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access to Email Accounts
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutter-health.jpeg
Sutter Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Website Tracking Technologies (Pixels, Cookies, Web Beacons, JavaScript)
Motivation: Data Collection for Marketing/Third-Party Use
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-day vulnerability in MOVEit Transfer programme
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of MOVEit Transfer Server Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Phoenix House Florida company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sutter Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sutter Health company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Phoenix House Florida company.

In the current year, Sutter Health company has reported more cyber incidents than Phoenix House Florida company.

Neither Sutter Health company nor Phoenix House Florida company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sutter Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Phoenix House Florida company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sutter Health company nor Phoenix House Florida company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Phoenix House Florida company nor Sutter Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Phoenix House Florida nor Sutter Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Phoenix House Florida company nor Sutter Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sutter Health company employs more people globally than Phoenix House Florida company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Phoenix House Florida nor Sutter Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Phoenix House Florida nor Sutter Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Phoenix House Florida nor Sutter Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Phoenix House Florida nor Sutter Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Phoenix House Florida nor Sutter Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Phoenix House Florida nor Sutter Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N