Comparison Overview

Phoenix Art Museum

VS

Athenaeum Music & Arts Library

Phoenix Art Museum

1625 N. Central Ave, Phoenix, 85004, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

PhxArt is the largest visual arts institution in the southwestern United States, with a collection of more than 21,000 objects of American, Latin American, European, Asian, modern, and contemporary art and fashion, held in the public trust. Over the institution's 65-year history, tens of millions of visitors have engaged with art in our galleries through thought-provoking exhibitions, meaningful education programs, and dynamic community events that bring together people of all ages, backgrounds, and life experiences. Mission: Phoenix Art Museum creates spaces of exchange and belonging for all audiences through dynamic exhibitions, collections, and experiences with art. To learn more about Phoenix Art Museum, visit PhxArt.org or call 602-257-1880.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 198
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Athenaeum Music & Arts Library

1008 Wall St, La Jolla, California, 92037, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

The Athenaeum Music & Arts Library is a vibrant and respected cultural institution and one of only seventeen membership libraries in the US. Three historic buildings are united in La Jolla offering welcoming and accessible library/reading rooms, exhibition spaces, a music performance room, an art studio, and administrative offices. The Athenaeum Art Center in Logan Heights houses a complete print studio; facilities for painting, drawing, and sculpture; and equipment for ceramics. The Athenaeum counts nearly 2,000 members, 100,000 visitors, and hosts 150 programs a year that include concerts of chamber music, jazz, and new music; art exhibitions; openings and receptions; lectures and courses; studio art instruction; school programs; and offerings for people of all ages.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phoenix-art-museum.jpeg
Phoenix Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/athenaeum-music-&-arts-library.jpeg
Athenaeum Music & Arts Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Phoenix Art Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Athenaeum Music & Arts Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phoenix Art Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Athenaeum Music & Arts Library in 2026.

Incident History — Phoenix Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phoenix Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Athenaeum Music & Arts Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Athenaeum Music & Arts Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phoenix-art-museum.jpeg
Phoenix Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/athenaeum-music-&-arts-library.jpeg
Athenaeum Music & Arts Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Phoenix Art Museum company and Athenaeum Music & Arts Library company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Athenaeum Music & Arts Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Phoenix Art Museum company.

In the current year, Athenaeum Music & Arts Library company and Phoenix Art Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Athenaeum Music & Arts Library company nor Phoenix Art Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Athenaeum Music & Arts Library company nor Phoenix Art Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Athenaeum Music & Arts Library company nor Phoenix Art Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Phoenix Art Museum company nor Athenaeum Music & Arts Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Phoenix Art Museum nor Athenaeum Music & Arts Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Phoenix Art Museum company nor Athenaeum Music & Arts Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Phoenix Art Museum company employs more people globally than Athenaeum Music & Arts Library company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Phoenix Art Museum nor Athenaeum Music & Arts Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Phoenix Art Museum nor Athenaeum Music & Arts Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Phoenix Art Museum nor Athenaeum Music & Arts Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Phoenix Art Museum nor Athenaeum Music & Arts Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Phoenix Art Museum nor Athenaeum Music & Arts Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Phoenix Art Museum nor Athenaeum Music & Arts Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H