Comparison Overview

Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens

VS

Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education

Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens

1 Schenley Park, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Founded in 1893, Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens in Pittsburgh, Pa. is a green leader among public gardens with a mission to inspire and educate all with the beauty and importance of plants; to advance sustainability and promote human and environmental well-being through action and research; and to celebrate its historic glasshouse. Learn more: www.phipps.conservatory.org Connect with us: facebook.com/phippsconservatory instagram.com/phippsconservatory twitter.com/phippsnews youtube.com/user/phippsconservatory snapchat.com/add/phippsnews

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 157
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education

3540 N Mission Rd, Los Angeles, California 90031-3195, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for the Arts & Education is located in Los Angeles' historic Lincoln Heights neighborhood of East Los Angeles and is the longest-operating Latino-based multidisciplinary community arts center in the United States. The organization recognizes the importance of providing a creative outlet for communities that face significant social, economic, and cultural challenges. It is a non-profit organization that specializes in educating and supporting local communities through artistic and cultural programs including its School of Performing & Visual Arts. Plaza's mission is to foster the enrichment of all cultures bridging the geographic, social, artistic, and cultural boundaries of Los Angeles and beyond.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phipps-conservatory.jpeg
Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/plaza-de-la-raza.jpeg
Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education in 2025.

Incident History — Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phipps-conservatory.jpeg
Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/plaza-de-la-raza.jpeg
Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company and Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company.

In the current year, Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education company and Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education company nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education company nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education company nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company nor Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens nor Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company nor Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company employs more people globally than Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens nor Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens nor Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens nor Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens nor Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens nor Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens nor Plaza de la Raza Cultural Center for Arts and Education holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X