Comparison Overview

PhilWeb Group

VS

Pinnacle

PhilWeb Group

One San Miguel Avenue cor. Shaw Blvd., Ortigas Center, 41/F One San Miguel Avenue Bldg, Pasig City, Metro Manila, PH
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

PhilWeb is a publicly listed company and is one of the leading gaming technology providers in the Philippines. It excels in the gaming industry by offering superior and innovative products while maintaining the highest standards of customer service. The company establishes strategic partnerships to ensure a fair, secure, and legal gaming experience for customers. Additionally, PhilWeb fosters a rewarding and dynamic work environment that attracts, retains, and motivates highly competent, passionate, and innovative individuals, delivering above-market value for shareholders.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 382
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pinnacle

undefined, Willemstad, undefined, undefined, CW
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Pinnacle (formerly known as Pinnacle Sports) was established in 1998, and since that time has been offering bettors a unique alternative to other bookmakers. Our gimmick free approach simply focuses on offering the best odds, and highest betting limits for every market we provide, so bettors win more compared to the competition.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 427
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philweb-group.jpeg
PhilWeb Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinnacle-sports.jpeg
Pinnacle
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PhilWeb Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pinnacle
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PhilWeb Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pinnacle in 2025.

Incident History — PhilWeb Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PhilWeb Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pinnacle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pinnacle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philweb-group.jpeg
PhilWeb Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinnacle-sports.jpeg
Pinnacle
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both PhilWeb Group company and Pinnacle company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Pinnacle company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PhilWeb Group company.

In the current year, Pinnacle company and PhilWeb Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pinnacle company nor PhilWeb Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pinnacle company nor PhilWeb Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pinnacle company nor PhilWeb Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PhilWeb Group company nor Pinnacle company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PhilWeb Group nor Pinnacle holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PhilWeb Group company nor Pinnacle company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pinnacle company employs more people globally than PhilWeb Group company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither PhilWeb Group nor Pinnacle holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PhilWeb Group nor Pinnacle holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PhilWeb Group nor Pinnacle holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PhilWeb Group nor Pinnacle holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PhilWeb Group nor Pinnacle holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PhilWeb Group nor Pinnacle holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H