Comparison Overview

Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS

VS

ATL

Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS

1403 North Maish Rd., Frankfort, 46041, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.psaws.com

Phillips Saw & Tool, Inc. is a family-owned business proudly serving the cutting tool industry since 1989. Located in Frankfort, Indiana, we specialize in precision sharpening and custom tooling solutions for a wide range of industrial applications. Our 11,000 sq. ft. facility is equipped with state-of-the-art CNC machinery, including several robotic grinding systems that enable around-the-clock production. While sharpening remains our core strength, we’re expanding into advanced manufacturing—offering custom saw blades and niche-size tooling designed to meet the unique needs of our customers. We’re passionate about quality, innovation, and customer service. Whether you need high-performance tooling solutions, expert sharpening, or collaboration on a custom blade project, Phillips Saw & Tool is ready to deliver. Let’s build something sharp together.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ATL

Unit E, Progress Road, High Wycombe, HP12 4JD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cvd.co.uk

WELCOME TO ATL! Established in 1980 in High Wycombe, 50km from London, ATL has steadily developed a reputation as a global leader in CVD R&D programme development and execution and Systems Engineering. We have successfully completed over 300 projects globally, working with both some of the leading engineering firms of the world and smaller organisations. We have undertaken projects in all the major industries requiring extreme environment coating development. Our projects have led to major technical breakthroughs, such as hybrid ceramic jet engines, ceramic cladding for nuclear fuel rods and critical components for nuclear fusion reactors. We have executed projects from $5,000 to $5 million, and are experienced working on all phases of coating development. Our particular success is drawing on our breadth and depth of experience in designing your system or R&D programme to ensure efficient and successful execution. Our proven process is for the initial engagement to be with one of our directors from the outset, who have been involved with the company since its formation, who are supported by a growing team of talented systems engineers and material scientists. We look forward to working with you on your project.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phillips-saw-&-tool-inc-.jpeg
Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/archer-technicoat-ltd.jpeg
ATL
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ATL
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ATL in 2025.

Incident History — Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ATL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ATL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phillips-saw-&-tool-inc-.jpeg
Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/archer-technicoat-ltd.jpeg
ATL
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ATL company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ATL company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS company.

In the current year, ATL company and Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ATL company nor Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ATL company nor Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ATL company nor Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS company nor ATL company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS nor ATL holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS company nor ATL company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ATL company employs more people globally than Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS nor ATL holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS nor ATL holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS nor ATL holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS nor ATL holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS nor ATL holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Phillips Saw & Tool - PSAWS nor ATL holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References