Comparison Overview

Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc.

VS

SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc.

Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc.

PO Box 2369, Annapolis, Maryland, 21401, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799

Phillips Charitable Foundation supports charitable organizations that provide a genuine impact on the lives of others by solving problems, removing obstacles, and leading to lasting solutions. Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. is a private charitable foundation founded in 2016 by Eileen Gross at the request of Howard W. Phillips Jr. Mr. Phillips was a 1944 graduate of Landon School and a 1950 graduate of Lehigh University. He remained an active and engaged Alumni for both institutions. He was successful in business, leading the second generation of his family’s business ventures in insurance and real estate investments. We Support: Humanitarianism: Preserving human dignity through solution-driven endeavors to improve self-sufficiency Arts and Culture: Strengthening society through arts and culture Education: Innovative and engaging approaches to learning

NAICS: 813
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc.

8484 Georgia Avenue, Suite 300, Silver Spring, Maryland, US, 20910
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799

Support Our Aging Religious (SOAR!) raises funds to ensure the safety, comfort and dignity of aging Catholic sisters, brothers and priests. SOAR! supports the efforts of the institutional Church by distributing grants to address the immediate needs of aging religious across the United States. These grants typically provide practical assistance such as renovations for accessibility, hospital beds, nurse call stations, automatic doors and assistive devices. Because of SOAR! grants, many women and men religious are able to remain with their communities. The grants also help the congregations devote more of their resources to their active ministries.

NAICS: 8132
NAICS Definition: Grantmaking and Giving Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phillips-charitable-foundation-inc.jpeg
Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/soarusa.jpeg
SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Philanthropic Fundraising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Philanthropic Fundraising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phillips-charitable-foundation-inc.jpeg
Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/soarusa.jpeg
SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. company.

In the current year, SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. company and Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. company nor Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. company nor Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. company nor Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. company nor SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. nor SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. company nor SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. company employs more people globally than Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Philanthropic Fundraising Services.

Neither Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. nor SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. nor SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. nor SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. nor SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. nor SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Phillips Charitable Foundation, Inc. nor SOAR! Support Our Aging Religious, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H