Comparison Overview

Philip Thomae Photographer

VS

Bear Foot Creative

Philip Thomae Photographer

undefined, undefined, undefined, 77979, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Philip Thomae is the driving force at Philip Thomae Photographer. He gets the jobs, is the creative genius behind all work and executes the work assignment. He does the billing and the bookkeepping as well. He works 7 days a week and will accept assignments 24 hours per day. He works well with people of all ages and backgrounds. A truly gifted and astounding individual to say the least about Philip Thomae Photographer in Port Lavaca, Texas. Check out the Port Lavaca Chamber of Commerce for a personal recommendation and samples of work that he has done for them.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bear Foot Creative

None, None, Tenino, None, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Bear Foot Creative is owned by photographers Dallen & Madeline Houston. Currently, we focus on creating fine art photography prints and stock photography focusing on the Pacific Northwest United States. In the future we plan to expand into other arts and crafts, especially using homegrown and recycled products. We also plan to expand into natural light portrait photography, focusing on families, farms, and businesses.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philip-thomae-photographer.jpeg
Philip Thomae Photographer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Bear Foot Creative
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Philip Thomae Photographer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bear Foot Creative
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Philip Thomae Photographer in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bear Foot Creative in 2025.

Incident History — Philip Thomae Photographer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Philip Thomae Photographer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bear Foot Creative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bear Foot Creative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philip-thomae-photographer.jpeg
Philip Thomae Photographer
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Bear Foot Creative
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bear Foot Creative company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Philip Thomae Photographer company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bear Foot Creative company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Philip Thomae Photographer company.

In the current year, Bear Foot Creative company and Philip Thomae Photographer company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bear Foot Creative company nor Philip Thomae Photographer company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bear Foot Creative company nor Philip Thomae Photographer company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bear Foot Creative company nor Philip Thomae Photographer company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Philip Thomae Photographer company nor Bear Foot Creative company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Philip Thomae Photographer nor Bear Foot Creative holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Philip Thomae Photographer company nor Bear Foot Creative company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Philip Thomae Photographer company employs more people globally than Bear Foot Creative company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Philip Thomae Photographer nor Bear Foot Creative holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Philip Thomae Photographer nor Bear Foot Creative holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Philip Thomae Photographer nor Bear Foot Creative holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Philip Thomae Photographer nor Bear Foot Creative holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Philip Thomae Photographer nor Bear Foot Creative holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Philip Thomae Photographer nor Bear Foot Creative holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N