Comparison Overview

Philadelphia Insurance Companies

VS

Unum

Philadelphia Insurance Companies

One Bala Plaza, Suite 100, Bala Cynwyd, PA, US, 19004
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 650 and 699

Philadelphia Insurance Companies, a member of the Tokio Marine Group, designs, markets and underwrites commercial property/casualty and professional liability insurance products for select industries. We are corporately based outside of Philadelphia and have more than 50 offices nationwide. In business for over 50 years, PHLY is nationally recognized as a member of Ward's Top 50, one of the Best Places to Work in Insurance, and one of the Healthiest 100 Workplaces in America.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 2,198
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Unum

1 Fountain Sq., Chattanooga, TN, US, 37402
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

Since our founding in 1848, Unum has been a leader in the employee benefits business through innovation, integrity and an unwavering commitment to our customers. This simple philosophy has guided us through America’s fledgling insurance landscape and helped us become an international leader in financial protection benefits, offering disability, life, accident, critical illness, dental, vision and stop-loss insurance; leave and absence management support and behavioral health services.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 11,411
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philadelphia-insurance-companies.jpeg
Philadelphia Insurance Companies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unum.jpeg
Unum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Philadelphia Insurance Companies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Unum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Philadelphia Insurance Companies in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unum in 2026.

Incident History — Philadelphia Insurance Companies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Philadelphia Insurance Companies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Unum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philadelphia-insurance-companies.jpeg
Philadelphia Insurance Companies
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unum.jpeg
Unum
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Unum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Philadelphia Insurance Companies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Unum company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Philadelphia Insurance Companies company.

In the current year, Unum company and Philadelphia Insurance Companies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Philadelphia Insurance Companies company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Unum company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Unum company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Philadelphia Insurance Companies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Unum company nor Philadelphia Insurance Companies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Unum company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Philadelphia Insurance Companies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies nor Unum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Unum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Philadelphia Insurance Companies company.

Unum company employs more people globally than Philadelphia Insurance Companies company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies nor Unum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies nor Unum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies nor Unum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies nor Unum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies nor Unum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies nor Unum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.