Comparison Overview

Philadelphia Insurance Companies

VS

Assurant

Philadelphia Insurance Companies

One Bala Plaza, Suite 100, Bala Cynwyd, PA, US, 19004
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 650 and 699

Philadelphia Insurance Companies, a member of the Tokio Marine Group, designs, markets and underwrites commercial property/casualty and professional liability insurance products for select industries. We are corporately based outside of Philadelphia and have more than 50 offices nationwide. In business for over 50 years, PHLY is nationally recognized as a member of Ward's Top 50, one of the Best Places to Work in Insurance, and one of the Healthiest 100 Workplaces in America.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 2,198
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Assurant

260 Interstate North Circle SE, Atlanta, 30339, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Assurant is a leading global business services company that supports, protects, and connects major consumer purchases. A Fortune 500 company with a presence in 21 countries, Assurant supports the advancement of the connected world by partnering with the world’s leading brands to develop innovative solutions and deliver an enhanced customer experience through mobile device solutions, extended service contracts, vehicle protection services, renters insurance, lender-placed insurance products, and other specialty products. Thank you for visiting Assurant’s LinkedIn community. Before posting, please review our guidelines at https://www.assurant.com/social-community-guidelines.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 16,250
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philadelphia-insurance-companies.jpeg
Philadelphia Insurance Companies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/assurant.jpeg
Assurant
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Philadelphia Insurance Companies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Assurant
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Philadelphia Insurance Companies in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Assurant in 2026.

Incident History — Philadelphia Insurance Companies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Philadelphia Insurance Companies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Assurant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Assurant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philadelphia-insurance-companies.jpeg
Philadelphia Insurance Companies
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/assurant.jpeg
Assurant
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Assurant company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Philadelphia Insurance Companies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Philadelphia Insurance Companies company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Assurant company has not reported any.

In the current year, Assurant company and Philadelphia Insurance Companies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Philadelphia Insurance Companies company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Assurant company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Assurant company nor Philadelphia Insurance Companies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Assurant company nor Philadelphia Insurance Companies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies company nor Assurant company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies nor Assurant holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies company nor Assurant company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Assurant company employs more people globally than Philadelphia Insurance Companies company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies nor Assurant holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies nor Assurant holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies nor Assurant holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies nor Assurant holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies nor Assurant holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Philadelphia Insurance Companies nor Assurant holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.