Comparison Overview

Phenix Label Company, Inc.

VS

Cranky Pressman

Phenix Label Company, Inc.

11610 S Alden St, Olathe, 66062, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.phenixlabel.com

Phenix Label is a 5th generation family-owned label and packaging partner delivering innovative solutions that help brands stand out and scale. For 130 years, we’ve helped food & beverage, personal care, pharmaceutical, household, and automotive brands bring their products to market with precision, speed, and impact. From labels and flexible packaging to RFID smart labeling, our team makes packaging one less thing you have to worry about. What sets us apart? Dedicated customer teams, in-house R&D, sustainability leadership, and unmatched service that simplifies your packaging process while supporting your bottom line. Phenix Label — Better Service. Bottom Line.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cranky Pressman

451 E. Pershing Street, Salem, Ohio, 44460, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.crankypressman.com

Cranky Pressman is not some cute boutique. We are a commercial letterpress printer serving the creative community of graphic designers, advertising agencies, illustrators and studios. This fancy new internet allows us to work with customers coast to coast without them having ever see our miserable mugs. Likewise, other modern technology, such as our 1-800-433-1288 toll free number, means we are just a shout away. And despite all this digital hocus-pocus, you can rest assured that an actual grouchy fellow is sweating away on every project. Exactly as you like it. At Cranky Pressman we print things the antiquated way, by letterpress. We lay real ink down on real paper, pretty much the same way it’s been done for about 500 years. It may not be the slickest production on the block but anyone who’s familiar with the handmade look and feel that letterpress brings to a graphic piece understands why we keep cranking it out this way.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phenix-label.jpeg
Phenix Label Company, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cranky-pressman.jpeg
Cranky Pressman
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Phenix Label Company, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cranky Pressman
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phenix Label Company, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cranky Pressman in 2025.

Incident History — Phenix Label Company, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phenix Label Company, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cranky Pressman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cranky Pressman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phenix-label.jpeg
Phenix Label Company, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cranky-pressman.jpeg
Cranky Pressman
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Phenix Label Company, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cranky Pressman company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cranky Pressman company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Phenix Label Company, Inc. company.

In the current year, Cranky Pressman company and Phenix Label Company, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cranky Pressman company nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cranky Pressman company nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cranky Pressman company nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. company nor Cranky Pressman company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. nor Cranky Pressman holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. company nor Cranky Pressman company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Phenix Label Company, Inc. company employs more people globally than Cranky Pressman company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. nor Cranky Pressman holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. nor Cranky Pressman holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. nor Cranky Pressman holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. nor Cranky Pressman holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. nor Cranky Pressman holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. nor Cranky Pressman holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References