Comparison Overview

PharMerica

VS

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

PharMerica

805 N Whittington Pkwy, Louisville, 40222, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 650 and 699

Headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky, PharMerica is one of the largest institutional pharmacy companies in the U.S. With more than 180 long-term care pharmacies in almost every state, we offer a national scope with a local approach, as well as unmatched clinical quality and customer care. With approximately 6,000 dedicated employees, PharMerica is proud to be home to some of the industry’s best and brightest clinicians and innovators. Check out our current openings, ranging from long-term care pharmacy roles to corporate and other non-clinical opportunities. To support your quality of life, we offer educational opportunities, remote work, and a comprehensive benefits package.

NAICS: 3254
NAICS Definition: Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees: 3,204
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

None
Last Update: 2026-01-18

At Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, we innovate with purpose, to lead where medicine is going. The experiences of patients around the world inform and inspire our science-based innovations, which continue to change and save lives. Applying rigorous science with compassion, we confidently address the most complex diseases of our time and develop the potential medicines of tomorrow. We are continuously working to develop treatments, aspiring to find cures, pioneering the path from lab to life, and championing patients every step of the way. https://bit.ly/3reuMvK

NAICS: 3254
NAICS Definition: Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees: 37,729
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pharmerica.jpeg
PharMerica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jnjinnovativemedicine.jpeg
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PharMerica
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PharMerica in 2026.

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine in 2026.

Incident History — PharMerica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PharMerica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pharmerica.jpeg
PharMerica
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Hacking
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jnjinnovativemedicine.jpeg
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PharMerica company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

PharMerica company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company has not reported any.

In the current year, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company and PharMerica company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company nor PharMerica company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

PharMerica company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company nor PharMerica company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PharMerica company nor Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PharMerica nor Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PharMerica company.

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company employs more people globally than PharMerica company, reflecting its scale as a Pharmaceutical Manufacturing.

Neither PharMerica nor Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PharMerica nor Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PharMerica nor Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PharMerica nor Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PharMerica nor Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PharMerica nor Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H