Comparison Overview

Phaidon

VS

Domino

Phaidon

2 Cooperage Yard, London, undefined, E15 2QR, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.phaidon.com/

Celebrating 100 years of creativity Phaidon is the premier global publisher of the creative arts with over 1,500 titles in print. We work with the world's most influential artists, chefs, writers and thinkers to produce innovative books on art, photography, design, architecture, fashion, food and travel, and illustrated books for children. Phaidon is headquartered in London and New York City.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Domino

145 W 28th St, New York, New York, 10001, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.domino.com

Home to domino magazine and domino.com, the first-of-its-kind multi-platform brand in the home design space, domino provides inspirational content through world-class editorial and effortless e-commerce. The newly re-imagined domino, launched in October 2013, captures the spirit of self-expression for design enthusiasts everywhere and encourages consumers to bring their personal style home. It defines the online convergence between content, community and commerce. Domino is a part of Acton Media Inc., which is a portfolio company of North Equity LLC.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 234
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phaidon-press.jpeg
Phaidon
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/domino-magazine.jpeg
Domino
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Phaidon
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Domino
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phaidon in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Domino in 2025.

Incident History — Phaidon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phaidon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Domino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Domino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phaidon-press.jpeg
Phaidon
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/domino-magazine.jpeg
Domino
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Phaidon company and Domino company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Domino company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Phaidon company.

In the current year, Domino company and Phaidon company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Domino company nor Phaidon company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Domino company nor Phaidon company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Domino company nor Phaidon company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Phaidon company nor Domino company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Phaidon nor Domino holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Domino company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Phaidon company.

Domino company employs more people globally than Phaidon company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Phaidon nor Domino holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Phaidon nor Domino holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Phaidon nor Domino holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Phaidon nor Domino holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Phaidon nor Domino holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Phaidon nor Domino holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References